European Commission vs. Thought Criminals

     A member of the European Commission, and all around censorious Eurocrat Tierry Breton has openly warred that a -non-European company hosting a chat with a candidate for a non-European public office could be acting illegally due to “disseminating” doubleplusungood wrongthink.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (August 18th, 2024)

 

News of the Week for August 18th, 2024


Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on News of the Week (August 18th, 2024)

Firing Line Friday: Are Medical Costs Controllable?

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The exponentially rising cost of medical care, even above that of inflation, has long been catnip for those who call for bigger government, including those who wish to controls costs by rationing and/or euthanasia. Between Medicare and later Medicaid being inacted to the passage of Obamacare, let us look back at a less than successful proposal thirty years ago as Charles A. Sanders, J. Ward Kurad, and Richard Janewy discuss with William F. Buckley, Jr. the question of whether medical costs are controllable?

     Until next Friday.

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: Are Medical Costs Controllable?

Quick Takes – Racial Discrimination Obsession: “Bias Incident” Reporting For Wrongthink Opinion; DEI Discrimination; Affirmative Action Stopped In California… Again

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: We can’t all be equal if some are not made more equal than others, after all.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Crimes against those of Asian descent have been increasingly in the news lately. Rather than deal with actual criminals, some in Minnesota would rather track expressions of wrongthink.

“Separate from the reporting of hate crimes to the police — reports that are collected and reported annually by the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension — the bill sets up a system to report incidents that fall short of criminal acts or are not reported because the victim chooses not to. People could report events to community groups that might be more trusted. And those reports could be gathered to provide a fuller idea of what is happening on the ground.

“Rebecca Lucero, commissioner of the state Department of Human Rights, told the House Public Safety Committee last week she supports expanded options for people who face slurs or verbal attacks to report them. She said her office and state lawmakers would then have a better idea of the volume of such incidents.

“‘Using the data collected can help you and community groups inform next steps — education, outreach or some other decisions you decide to make,’ Lucero told House members last month. Neither the human rights law or the hate crimes provisions apply, for example, to slurs shouted at a person because of their race, she said.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Quick Takes – Racial Discrimination Obsession: “Bias Incident” Reporting For Wrongthink Opinion; DEI Discrimination; Affirmative Action Stopped In California… Again

The Exception That Proves The Sex Binary Rule

     Reality is reality, just as A is A.   And the reality is that human beings are a sexually dimorphic species with two sexes with both physical and actually physiological differences, some acute and some statistically obvious.   There is no “spectrum”. There is no “gender identity” with any objective reality to it that is separate and distinct from biological sex. People insisting that a biological male can get periods if he identifies as a girl, that cancer works differently based on your gender identity, or that chromosomes magically change as if will alone can bend reality—are all science deniers and have rejected what people have seen clearly since time immemorial.

     There are two ways to approach this. The first is to do what people did before science informed us of sex determining chromosomes: Recognize the obvious. There were people with female genitalia who could get pregnant and give birth to a baby that they could nurse (Women) and there were those with male genitalia who could couple their genitalia with those women and impregnate them (Men). People recognized obvious differences in physical form, as well as how men tended to be bigger and stronger than women, while women showed many other actual physiological differences with men when it came to abilities and how they acted. Even then, people recognized that not everyone with female genitalia would be fertile or ever give birth, just as there were males who couldn’t impregnate a female. Nonetheless, “boys have a penis; girls have a vagina” as Kindergarten Cop explained to us.

     The other approach is the strictly scientific one.

“In humans, as in most animals or plants, an organism’s biological sex corresponds to one of two distinct types of reproductive anatomy that develop for the production of small or large sex cells—sperm and eggs, respectively—and associated biological functions in sexual reproduction. In humans, reproductive anatomy is unambiguously male or female at birth more than 99.98% of the time. The evolutionary function of these two anatomies is to aid in reproduction via the fusion of sperm and ova. No third type of sex cell exists in humans, and therefore there is no sex ‘spectrum’ or additional sexes beyond male and female. Sex is binary.”

     Note, that caveat that is not inconsistent with the purely observational delineation of the sexes between male and female: Specifically that there are actual bona fide cases where a person does not develop in accordance with their chromosomes. As your humble author has previously noted: “there are abnormal cases of non ‘XX’ or ‘XY’ chromosome pairings (e.g. XO, XXY), or of a body developing in utero contra to chromosomes, but those are rare and not indicative of a ‘social norm’ of recognizing that the vast majority of people are indeed women or men, a fact confirmed by not only our entire history as a species, but of practically every other mammalian species in existence.”

     In other words, the exception proves the rule, in both senses of the word “prove”.

Continue reading

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Abolition Of Dissent In The U.K.

     The United Kingdom has long since transcended from merely draconian to outright farce in its war on its own people.   The full weight of the government has been placed on such dastardly crimes as illegal use of spoons, using an assault whisk, praying silently, and worst of all, the sin of being a victim of domestic violence! But then, if anything, violence against women and girls seems to be either acceptable or outright in need of police protection! But worst of all is the expression of wrongthink.

     And in keeping in that Orwellian theme, Big Brother is watching and warning you not to post doubleplusungood social media!

     And this is no idle threat. The U.K. has been arresting and jailing people committing such thoughtcrime expression for years now. With the recent protests/riots against the new Labour government under Keir Starmer, the British police and courts have been going all out to silence and crush dissenters who dare to… share someone else’s Facebook post.

     The pure hatred of the U.K. elite is clear, and their disgust with those who dare dissent put on full display.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

No More Mother, No More Father

     The blurring of the lines between men and women has long come in the form of denying any distinction and indeed any distinction of “gender” or mandated “gender neutral” ideology.   This has spread to a general assault of the English language and the very concept of “father” and “mother” around the world, in the courts, in Left-wing states, and even Congress.   Now, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will replace the terms “mother” and “father” on birth certificates to, respectively, “person who gave birth” and “other parent”, respectively. Bill H.4970 (2024) also changes “child born out of wedlock” to the more innocuous “nonmarital child”, and abolished paternity as a concept distinct from maternity—which is consistent with reality and experience—with the more generic “parentage.”

     The gender neutral wording is an unnatural usage and completely at odds with the difference of determining paternity and maternity in order to pretend that determining parentage is the same regardless of the gender/sex of the parent! The bill itself is primarily a series of substitutions and a creating of new gender neutral terms to replace centuries of what had been obvious.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (August 11th, 2024)

 

News of the Week for August 11th, 2024


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (August 11th, 2024)

Firing Line Friday: The Republican Party and Moderates

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The question of purity vs. pragmatism in politics is an old one, as this discussion between William F. Buckley, Jr., Jim Leach, and William A. Rusher concerning the Republican Party and moderates.

Continue reading

Posted in Elections, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – End Of Life? Euthanizing Because Of Eating Disorders; Euthanizing Because Of Bed Sores; Euthanizing Because Of Mental Illness

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: A “dignified death” for the undesirables.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

Death, Rx

     Anorexia or Bulimia? Both are welcome to die!

“We identified 10 peer-reviewed articles and 20 government reports describing at least 60 patients with EDs who underwent assisted dying between 2012 and 2024. Clinical rationales were categorized into three domains: irremediability, terminality, and voluntary request. Reports emphasized that patients with EDs who underwent assisted death had terminal, incurable, and/or untreatable conditions and had adequate decision-making capacity to make a life-ending decision. Most government reports did not include descriptive-enough data to verify psychiatric conditions.”

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment