Regenerative Society: Communism By Another Name

     Notice how some people push Communism without calling it Communism? This is particularly true when it takes on an ecological sheen by the “Watermelons” (Green on the outside and Red inside).   When you can’t get the masses to rise up, you gotta resort to scaring them with environmental alarmism and doom.   Such is the case of “regenerative society” that demands a “degrowth economy” followed by a “post-growth economy”:

Degrowth as a transition from a growth economy to a post-growth economy. pic.twitter.com/ux3iB4RWeK

— Timothée Parrique (@timparrique) March 14, 2023

     Let’s go point by point:

An increase in production and consumption to grow profit for private owners by privatizing the benefits and socializing the losses in the spirit of enhancing well-being for the selected few. pic.twitter.com/40iCeoshce

— Timothée Parrique (@timparrique) March 14, 2023

     Yup, it’s the same old Marxist line where the elite Capitalists have everything and make everyone else pay for it. Though notice how growth, which used to be what Communists wanted and believed could only happen equally for everyone under Marxist teachings, become universally bad because is make Gaia cry or something.

A reduction of production and consumption to lighten the ecological footprints, planned democratically in a spirit of social justice while improving well-being. pic.twitter.com/r4tPvNlH31

— Timothée Parrique (@timparrique) March 14, 2023

     And here we seen how the new eco-friendly Communism is even worse for everybody. They want to take away your stuff and make you eat less (i.e. they want to make you eath the bugs, live in the pod, drink the soy, and own nothing.

     And, of course, it will be run “democratically”, which means in reality rule by Nomenklatura, assuming it doesn’t just devolve into mob rule, complete with “social justice” as the justification for denying some people anything or forcing them to do anything… all for their “well-being”, of course.

     Oh, and this doesn’t apply to third world countries who are allowed to grow and pollute as much as they want, because CO₂ emmisions are only harmful to the environment with those privileged oppressors in 1^st World countries do it. Yet somehow this will eliminate 96% of emissions in just seven years! Clearly those in the 1^st World are going to have to give up everything if the rest of the world is to be allowed to release all the CO₂ they want. Even if the 3^rd World isn’t exempted, destroying nearly all industrial capacity would result in much of the world’s population to die… which is likely the actual point of this scheme.

A steady-state economy in harmony with nature
where decisions are taken together and where wealth is equitably shared in order to prosper without growth. pic.twitter.com/0w0u3eMWRi

— Timothée Parrique (@timparrique) March 14, 2023

     And here we get to their immanentized eschaton and utopia! Mankind kept in check to make Gaia happy (Nomenklatura excepted, of course) where everyone comes to agreement by consensus (which is provided by the Nomenklatura, of course) and share their misery and poverty equitably (but where “some are more equal than others”, of course).

     The utopia of the few is the hell of the many.

Tweet