Six Californias: An Analysis of Splitting California Into Six States

     A Silicon Valley venture capitalist, Tim Draper, is circulating an initiative measure to split California into six states.  Here we present a quick look at what that would mean politically.

     First let us look how the state would be broken up:

     Let us assign House seats by simply taking the current number (53) and assign them according to the percent of the California’s population in each, rounding appropriately, and then assigning the 53rd seat to the state most likely to get it we have:

  • “Jefferson” = 1
  • “Northern California” = 5
  • “Silicon Valley” = 10
  • “Central California” = 6
  • “West California” = 16
  • “Southern California” = 15

     Thus in each state would have the following electoral votes:

  • “Jefferson” = 3
  • “Northern California” = 7
  • “Silicon Valley” = 12
  • “Central California” = 8
  • “West California” = 18
  • “Southern California” = 17

     To get a feel for the political situation in each of the new states, we’ll look at two recent elections:  The 2010 Attorney General election, which was a near win for the Republicans with Steve Cooley, and the 2012 Presidential election.  Though Sen. Feinstein received a slightly higher percentage of the vote, we will focus on Obama’s re-election to gauge the impact nationally.

Presidential Elections

     In two of the proposed states, Romney would have won those states, with an additional 11 EV. (States were “Jefferson” and “Central California”)

     In a third state, the Republican Cooley would have won, but Obama would have squeaked by by middle-low single digits. (State was “South California,” comprising SoCal outside of L.A.). A truly purple state. It would yield about 17 EV.   This new state would be plurality Republican in registration.

     A fourth (“Northern California”) voted for Obama, as well as the Dem in the A.G. race, but the Dem won those counties in a squeaker, making this proposed state a borderline  one that could become purple in the future. In particular, with the correct demographic shift, it could easily go purple (it has liberal coastal elites and more conservative valley/mountain area).

     The two states of “Silicon Valley” and “West Calfironia” would be hard core Dem/Communist.

     Obama won all of California’s 55 electoral votes.  If the six states that were California been in place, Romney would have gotten 11 electoral votes, while Obama received 54 electoral vote.  This would have been a net electoral vote gain of 12 for Romney.

     If “South California” had been a separate state, it would have been competitive, and perhaps even winnable by the Republican nominee, as seen by Cooley’s victory in those five counties making up “South California.”  This would have resulted in 28 electoral voted for the Republican and only 37 for the Democrat.

House of Representatives

     When it came to the Congressional delegation, “Jefferson” would be solid GOP, and likely have a GOP legislature. “Central California” and “South California” would have majority GOP delegations and most likely majority GOP legislatures. “Northern California” would be probably 3:2 Dem:Rep, with a Democratic legislative majority. “Silicon Valley” would probably see the GOP drop to a third party behind Greens or the “Peace and Freedom” party. “West California” would have a few GOP seats, but otherwise be solid Dem.

U.S. Senate

     Of the ten new Senators, assigning the current Cal Senators to “Silicon Valley,” one state that would always send Dems (L.A. dominated “West California”), two states that would likely send GOP (“Jefferson” and “Central California”), one that would probably send GOP, but an occasional Dem (“South California”), and one that would send Dems, but where the GOP has a fighting chance (“Northern California”)

Future Politics

     The politics of the states would not remain static, though.  Sacramento is dominated by Bay Area politicians, who are electorally supported by L.A. county.  By confining the insanity to the state of “Silicon Valley,” the rest of the state would become much more conservative (even L.A., which is saying something).  You’d have new states that were friendly to the sane and the conservative.

     We could easily see “Southern California” gaining a lot of population due to is moderate to conservative (or at least libertarian-conservative) leanings, in addition to the presence of established infrastructure.

     The state of “Northern California” could even be converted to a relatively conservative area if there is enough of an influx — it would contain Napa county and Sonoma county, but be balanced by Placer county and the other mountain/valley counties inland.

     The bulk of the farmland, and control of much of the water, would be in the hands of GOP friendly “Central California” and would likely become a beacon for any and all farmers once again.  They would control the water, which would give them a heck of a lot of power.  What would happen to the Owens valley (from which L.A. stole its water), would be… interesting.

     Heck, even “West California” would see a significant slowing of its Left-ward drift due to not being a border state anymore, as well as being free from San Francisco.


     Aside from “Jefferson”, all other states would get at least one campus of the University of California (UC).

  • “Northern California” — UC Davis
  • “Silicon Valley” — UC Berkeley, UC San Francisco (medical school only), UC Santa Cruz
  • “Central California” — UC Merced
  • “West California” — UC Santa Barbara, UCLA
  • “Southern California” — UC Irvine, UC Riverside, UC San Diego
  • “Jefferson” wouldn’t get a UC, but would get Cal State Chico.

     Interestingly, it might prompt the conservative eastern parts of Oregon and even Washington to demand the right to join “Jefferson”…


     The break-up of California along the proposed boundaries would result in two Red states, one Purple state, and three Blue states which would range from almost Purple to “Left of Stalin.”

This entry was posted in Elections, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.