How The Terrorists Won In New Zealand

     After the now infamous “Mosque Attack” in New Zealand, the sad and pathetic excuse of a Prime Minister has given what the terrorists wanted while exploiting the tragedy to snuff out civil liberties and ancient civil rights in order to appeal this modern-day “age of feelz.”

     Not only has, within days, the possession of semi-automatic rifles (with scant few exceptions) suddenly banned, which the vast majority of gun owners ignored and criminals openly scoffed at, was declared to be “just the beginning“.

     And how, this example of the decline and fall of society went out of its way to do exactly what the terrorist wanted them to do, as stated in the madman’s “manifesto“:

“I chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world… With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty. This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines.”

     But, of course, this isn’t just about arms suitable for self-defense (funny how the use of a gun to stop/impede the terrorist attack resulted in not only an excuse to restrict that fundamental human right, but other rights as well), with those not only reporting via internet links newsworthy information, but anyone who dared talk about it outside of acceptable, and controlled, forums being promptly investigated, and even indicted and convicted, for daring to offer anything that opposed the politically correct actions of the Parliamentary DICTATORSHIP that New Zealand is plagued by.

     This is why pure democracy wherein “the will of the people” is supreme, will always descend into tyranny: The restraints that protect the rule of law and sacredness of liberty can and will be tossed aside in the heat of the moment, never to be regained again.

     Yes, this is the case of a “democratically elected” Nomenklatura destroyed civil liberties, but, then, this is an example either by electoral permission or expectant electoral manipulation whereby the mob rules… and therefrom only fools are listened to.

     Hat Tip for first video to Pixy Misa.

This entry was posted in Gun Rights, Progressives and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.