Common Core standards, created whole-cloth from the minds of the Obama administration, are seeking to burn down the straw-man of “rote memorization” and building “understanding” as a path towards building mathematical knowledge.

In the below video, a teacher training session explains why even if a student ” said 3 X 4 was 11, if they were able to explain their reasoning and explain how they came up with their answer, really in words and oral explanations and they showed it in a picture but they just got the final number wrong; we’re really more focusing on the how and the why.” It’s like insisting on a formal proof that 1 + 1 = 2 before teaching basic arithmetic!

Thus, another manichean choice is presented: Either children are told to memorize factoids and trained to spit them out on command, or they are taught to “understand” and “reason” things out for themselves. In other words:

“It’s an odd pedagogical agenda, based on a belief that conceptual understanding must come before practical skills can be mastered. As this thinking goes, students must be able to explain the “why” of a procedure. Otherwise, solving a math problem becomes a “mere calculation” and the student is viewed as not having true understanding.”

This is a false choice. It ** is** necessary to teach

*why*things are done in a certain way and what

*it is*that those mathematical manipulations. It is also necessary to show them and have them practice these mathematical techniques so that they can understand and get a feel for them. If you can’t actually do it, then you don’t really understand it. Plenty of valid mathematical techniques are put off or delayed while children are told to understand, without actually knowing what it is they are supposed to understand!

Ironically, rather than replace “rote memorization” with “understanding,” Common Core is *teaching* and *testing* on the wrote memorization of pre-thought out “reasoning.”

“‘Instead of many arithmetic problems, the homework would contain only three or four questions, and two of those would be “explain your answer,… [l]ike, ‘One bridge is 412 feet long and the other bridge is 206 feet long. Which bridge is longer? How do you know?”‘”

“She found she could not help her daughter answer the latter question: The ‘right’ answer involved heavy quotation from Common Core language. A program designed to encourage thought had ended up encouraging rote memorization not of math but of scripts about math.”

In order to pass these tests, no actual demonstration that the ideas are known and understood is necessary, only a regurgitation of quotes *about* understanding it. The only thing Common Core teaches is how to parrot the talking points provided by an authority figure.

Of course, that’s not a flaw; It’s by *design*.