Democracy of Now – Tyranny of the Future

     One of the stark contrasts between “Left” and “Right” is the question of tradition.  This is often simplified as “looking in the future” while “living in the now” in contrast with “being stuck in the past”.  Such simplicity makes the brave new world of the future, built upon the scientific reasoning of today, seem so much more attractive than the backwardness of the past.

     Such a choice is a false one, however.  The veritable R. Stacy McCain describes that choice far more aptly:

“We are heirs of a tradition. Each of us is born into circumstances that were created by our parents, by our grandparents, by our ancestors, and by the civilization in which they lived. Human life existed before we were born and will continue after our deaths. As children we inherit the past. As parents we create the future. Wisdom requires us to understand ourselves as a single link in an infinite chain of human existence, rather than to imagine ourselves as free-floating atoms unconnected to others.

“Popular ideas of ‘democracy’ — the modernistic idolatry that speaks the language of ‘rights,’ ‘choice’ and ‘equality’ — obscure the truth of human existence, trapping us in the present tense, isolating us as rootless individuals removed from the authentic traditions of our inheritance. Children are taught that the past is not merely useless, but actually harmful, because human history is nothing but a catalog of oppression, atrocities and victimhood. Thus, the modern child cannot be allowed to believe that his grandparents were wise or virtuous, that the great achievements of our civilization are worthy of respect.”

     The irony, of course, is that those “Progressive” ideas of democracy, rights, choice, and equality were derived from a society that evolved over centuries.  These were not abstract constructs, but the distilled wisdom of millions over centuries, and even mellenia.  They were not the starting point, or even the intent of society (for society has not “intent”).

     The idea that we face a manichean choice between the bad old ways and the glorious Progressive future is a false one.  Society evolves.  The mores, folkways, an customs either serve to bolster and thus perpetuate society, or they serve to destroy them.  The collected wisdom of the ages serves as empirical evidence of what does or does not work.

     Change happens, as it always does, but this is the natural evolution of society.  By applying tried and true principles, we can allow greater freedom of experimenting in new ideas and new ways, while retaining a strong society to fall back upon if new ideas fail by demonstration.

     Perhaps the Kinks said it best:

“Preserving the old ways from being abused
Protecting the new ways for me and for you”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Flowchart for Choosing Your Gender

     For the vast majority of people, they are either male or female based upon the presence, or lack of, dangly bits.

     For the less than 1% of people (special little snowflakes included), there is this handly little flowchart.

     Click on image for full size.

Gender Flowchart

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Flowchart for Choosing Your Gender

Occupy Syllabus: A Fisking

     How dare a classical social theory class talk about classical social theorists of Western thought be mentioned, at the expense of modern theorists and foreign ideologies?

     A rather pathetic whining about just such a class graced the student pages of the Daily Californian.

     Herein is a frisking of their idiocy.  Admittedly it is mild, but then it disserves but a modicum of mental energy…

“We are calling for an occupation of syllabi in the social sciences and humanities.”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Occupy Syllabus: A Fisking

Urban Utopia, Whether You Like It Or Not

     Urban planners remain enamored with a centralized and compact city where the Plebes will be enriched by the culture fed them by the elites (who all have country houses, of course).

     Upon what do they plan their utopias?   Failed Soviet planned cities of course…

“As is sometimes asserted by urbanists today, the new socialist cities were about more than mere economic growth; they were widely posed as a means to develop a new kind of society, one that could make possible the spread of Homo sovieticus (the Soviet man). As one German historian writes, the socialist city was to be a place ‘free of historical burdens, where a new human being was to come into existence, the city and the factory were to be a laboratory of a future society, culture, and way of life’.

“Elements of High Stalinist culture was evident in these cities; the cult of heavy industry, shock worker movement, youth group activity, and the aesthetics of socialist realism. This approach had no room for what in Britain was called “a middle landscape” between countryside and city. Throughout Russia, and much of Eastern Europe, tall apartment blocks were chosen over leafy suburbs. Soviets had no interest in suburbs of any kind because the character of a city ‘is that people live an urban life. And on the edges of the city or outside the city, they live a rural life’. The rural life was exactly what communist leaders hoped their country would get away from, therefore Soviet planners housed residents near industrial sites so they could contribute to their country through state-sponsored work.

“With this assumption, Soviet planners made some logical steps to promote density. They built nurseries and preschools as well as theatre and sports halls within walking distance to worker’s homes.   Communal eating areas were arranged. Also, wide boulevards were crucial for marches and to have a clear path to and from the factory for the workers. The goals of the ‘socialist city’ planners were to not just transform urban planning but human behavior, helping such spaces would breed the ‘urban human’.

“As is common with utopian approaches to cities, problems arose. Rapid development, the speed of construction, the use of night shifts, the long working days, and the inexperience of both workers and management all contributed to frequent technological failures. Contrary to the propaganda, there was a huge gap between the ideal of happy workers thriving in well-managed cities and the reality.”

     Shoving people into cities like sardines in a can has been one of the ideals of the Progressive elite (who again, will have country estates).

     The only solution is to submit to the state and their elitist planners, the Left declares.  They would take all your money to build an alleged utopia that will give you everything that the Soviets delivered via a vis their promise… to the tune of $90 Trillion Dollars.

     Their plans are out there.  Their plans are meant to be implemented.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Urban Utopia, Whether You Like It Or Not

News of the Week (February 1st, 2015)

 

News of the Week for Febuary 1st, 2015


Continue reading

Posted in War & Terror | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (February 1st, 2015)

A 13 year old gay autistic bigender shark-kin upper-class able-bodied communist sprite who uses Xe-Xem pronouns

     Special little snowflakes are so precocious stupid* and pretentious at that age

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Islamic State is Motivated by Islam; National Socialists were Motivated by Socialism; Huffington Post Motivated by DERP

     The Islamic State calls itself Islamic.  The Islamic State declares that it is motivated by Islam.  The Islamic State declares that it wants to impose Islamic law.  To any rational person it is clear that the Islamic State is motivated by Islam.  One can argue that their views on Islam are incorrect, and in that way are un-Islamic, but it is disingenuous at best to deny that the Islamic State doesn’t have anything to do with Islam.  To be charitable, it may be due to stupidity.

     A writer from the UK version of the Huffington Post seems to have embraces that stupidity, declaring that the Islamic State is neither Islamic nor a State.  On both counts, the author delusionally wrong.

     The Islamic State is a fully functional state.  It may be illegitimate, evil, &c., but it is a working state, just as much as Germany was a state under Hitler.

     As for being Islamic, the only argument against their being in actuality Islamic is to say that they are not representing what Islam truly believes.  One if free to argue that point; one is free to argue the counter point.  But when the Islamic State declares that everything they do is motivated by Islam, it is rather ridiculous to simply declare that a Western non-Muslim knows more about Islam than Muslims who endeavor to follow the Koran and the Hadiths to the letter.

     How does this writer from the Huffington Post defend his ridiculous position?  By declaring that Left wing ideologies aren’t Left Wing!  This idiotic notion has been already been demonstrated to be an idiotic lie.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, War & Terror | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Suicide is Male Privilege

It is being taught as absolute truth that being a privileged oppressor turns people into a social misfit (presumably due to covetously being covetous) who are then driven to suicide by their own evil.

Click on image for larger image.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Social Justice is Antithetical to Privacy

     One of the core tenets of “Social Justice” is the fundamental transformation of society.  To fundamentally transform society, you must fundamentally transform human thinking and behavior.  You can’t fundamentally transform human thinking and behavior if they have the legal shield of privacy.

     Your thoughts and beliefs must be the business of these fundamental transformers.  In other words, “when everything is a public issue, then  you have no private existence.”

     This can be veritably seen by the “street action” of the “Black Brunch” protesters.

“And a poorly informed one, at that: In New York City, protesters invaded the Pershing Square Café across the street from Grand Central Terminal, which is one of the more diverse spots in heavily segregated Manhattan, catering as it does to commuting 53-year-old lawyers from Fairfield County, who check any number of different demographic boxes.

“The message these protests send is that there is no private space — and, therefore, no private life — so far as this particular rabble is concerned. It’s the familiar Trotsky conundrum: You may not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in you.

“That the people at brunch have no real direct connection to the events motivating the protesters is beside the point. They were targeted on racial grounds: These were detestable ‘white spaces,’ and the people there were to be punished for being white — even if they were not, in fact, white, their presence in “white spaces” makes them guilty by association. That the protesters were themselves largely white goes without saying: Protests of this sort are a prestige performance for stupid white college kids, mainly. If you want to see a genuinely ‘white space,’ a protest is your best bet.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged | Comments Off on Social Justice is Antithetical to Privacy

Why Settle for One Pronoun?

     When you can have around a dozen?

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Why Settle for One Pronoun?