The Left And The Molding Of Mankind

     That human beings are born as a blank slate (i.e. Tabula Rasa) that can be moulded, or re-moulded after their collective slates have been wiped clean, is a long standing tenet of the broader Left that rejects that human beings have any, or least any appreciable, innate nature, as James Lindsay describes below (which is quoted in full due to the limitation of Twitter’s/X’s embed).

The Leftist mindset is that people are the product of their conditions. I don’t mean this in some cutesy way that’s kind of true, that we are shaped by our conditions. They believe fully literally that we are the product of our conditions, and “conditions” are those things that shape systemic political power.

That applies to every aspect of life, down to how we think the world works, the vocabulary we might use to communicate, what our hopes and fears are, what’s true and false, what’s right and wrong, everything. In particular, it defines something like a horizon of possibility that people hold for their lives. Their present conditions prevent them from seeing beyond that horizon, so they accept the limitations of the present world (real, fake, or whatever).

They believe that every existing society operates like a brainwashing bubble that “socializes” its members into this set of conceptual and imaginative limitations, and they believe that the people who control society control and maintain the terms upon which people are constructed and defined (through socialization into that society).

Every harm, every injustice, everything they don’t understand, every foiled hope, every dream that isn’t actually possible, etc., is therefore an indictment of the people who hold power over the existing society. Anything that threatens the existing socialization program is therefore potentially good or useful and can be brought into use for Leftist ends.

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Fear the Boom and Bust

     The question of the roll of the government in managing the economy is as hot a topic now as it has been through our history.

     Here is a debate between John Maynard Keynes and F. A. Hayek… in rap format!

Continue reading →

Posted in Elections, Progressives | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

News of the Week (October 18th, 2026)

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Leave a comment

Firing Line Friday: The Failure of Organized Religion

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The question of personal faith and organized religion can be a deeply personal one. Let us look back sixty years ago when William F. Buckley, Jr. debated his old philosophy teacher, Paul Weiss, who posed as a question the failure of organized religion.

Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Quick Takes – Canada Keeps Killing: Can’t Cook? Death! Eating Disorder? Death! Demented? Death!

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: In America it’s “give me liberty or give me death”; in Canada it’s “give me a sensible culinary experience or give me death”.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

Death, Rx

     Remember when euthanasia was sold as being for the terminally ill who were suffering in pain?   Apparently not being able to cook for your family is considered suffering worthy of death.

“Top Canadian doctors are raising alarm bells over the country’s seemingly quick approval for assisted dying requests, after one elderly woman was accepted based on the fact that she lost the ability to cook meals for her family.

“…

“One such case saw a woman in her 70s struggling with losing her ability to cook for her family, something she prided herself on as the matriarch of her family.

“When she was approved for assisted dying, she told doctors that she felt she had lost her value to her family. “

     Thankfully, she received legitimate counciling that convinced her that her life’s worth was more than the sum of the meals she can cook.

“Through counseling, she came to understand that her family valued who she was, not what she did for them. She decided not to go through with ending her life, at least for now.

“That Christmas, her family gathered and she sat proudly at the table while others did the cooking and serving.”

Continue reading →

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Why Postliberalism Failed

     Patrick Deneen is a Leftist. He invents a reductio ad absurdum that all “liberalism”, from Locke to Marx, are based on a near eschcatalogial obsession of atomized autonomous individuals freed from “family, tradition, religion, local community and even the limits of nature” to reach some religious apotheosis. This false dilemma fallacy ignores that Deneen’s critique is the same critique the collectivist Leftists use against classical liberalism more broadly, and conservatism in the American and Burkean vein more specifically. It isn’t that Locke and Marx are alike, but that they are different that explains why the later fails then, just as Deneen’s ideology fails nascently, as Kim R. Holmes observes (which is quoted in full due to the limitations of Twitter’s/X’s embeds).

I have a shorter and more correct answer. “Liberalism” failed because it deviated from classical liberalism (limited government and all that) and drifted into progressive socialist and Identitarian territory, derived not from Locke but from Marx, Gramsci and Marcuse. A reason why many post-liberals like Deneen don’t acknowledge that is because their social and economic worldview is functionally closer to those guys than to Locke, Jefferson and Madison.

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Camouflage Socialism

     The embrace of literal socialism by many on the purported “Right” is, at this point, hard to ignore. Yet the word “socialism” remains so toxic to so many outside of the Left, so the Socialist Right must deceive, inveigle, and obfuscate their socialism by trying to redefine it as “stuff we don’t like”. or more specifically using the state to control society other than they’d direct.

     Case in point is this rambling incoherent answer from J.D. Vance on how he’s define “socialism”:

     Organizing society to benefit the domestic worker is quintessential socialism. To many, it’s clear that it’s just a catch-all for social outcome they don’t fancy, and that it’s not socialism when they do it for the “common good”.

“Contrary to the vice president, ‘socialism,’ a theory of socioeconomic organization in which the state, to varying degrees, owns property and enterprise and redistributes private wealth and goods based on central planners’ determinations, is not a ‘hard term to define these days.’

“‘Classically, you would think, socialism is about prioritizing workers,’ Vance said. That sounds nice! But in the vice president’s view, today’s self-proclaimed socialists have perverted the philosophy’s noble intentions. ‘So, I don’t know what the term means anymore.’”

     Socialism becomes the opposite of what it is in order to justify socialism in deed while condemning it in name, much like how war is peace or up is down.

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

News of the Week (October 11th, 2026)

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Leave a comment

Firing Line Friday: The Death Penalty

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     With the recent botched execution in Tennessee, let us look back half-a-century when the question of the death penalty was an even more contentious question that it was now, as this debate between William F. Buckley, Jr., Ernest van den Haag, and Donald E. Shapiro demonstrates.

Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Quick Takes – Hiding DEI: DEI Payroll; DEI Over Editing; DEI Without Statements

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: They’re not saying it’s DEI, but it’s DEI

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     When you have to cut your budget… you keep your DEI payroll?

“Portland State University is eliminating two academic departments and 36 full-time positions as it confronts a $35 million deficit, while it and two other Oregon public universities maintain more than 90 DEI-related positions costing more than $7.2 million annually.

“PSU will eliminate its Conflict Resolution and University Studies departments and reduce six others under its final plan. The university says 36 full-time positions will be involuntarily eliminated and three more reduced to part time.

“Meanwhile, PSU, Oregon State University, and the University of Oregon maintain 92 DEI-related positions costing a combined $7,255,758, an Oregon Scholars analysis of university salary data found.”

Continue reading →

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment