Quick Takes – Crazy California: Reparations; Snitching On Haters; Escaping The Hellhole

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: The People’s Republic of California strikes again!

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Even if the current California Legislature Grand Soviet doesn’t appropriate the money, California—which entered the Union as a free state and never went through a territorial phase—approves of handing over $800,000,000 in “reparations”.

“California is still wrestling with the whole reparations question and has been for quite a while now. But yesterday, the task force assigned to look into the matter took a series of votes and approved several recommendations. None of these are moving immediately into law, but they are intended to inform the legislature so that final proposals can be voted on. They agreed on some form of apology and cash reparations. They didn’t specify an amount, but an earlier version of the proposal called for payments of at least $360,000. Of course, this plan would only apply to Black residents and not any other minorities. And the total bill would add up to more than two and a half times the state’s entire annual budget, even as California faces a significant budget shortfall.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Inevitable Overreach Of Social Conservatives

     America has reoccurring periods where authentic concern for real, or at least perceived to be real, social ills results in social activist from the more puritanical parts of American culture that inevitably overreach and end up sooner or later becoming mockeries of themselves. The closer to the present we get, the more pathetic the overreach and the greater the self-defeating antics.

     In the late 19th Century, the Comstock Laws were passed which banned the use of the Post Office from trading in “obscene literature”—not to mention the appellation of being “banned in Boston”. In time the Hays commission in the early 1930s clamped down on risque movies to the point pushing films into being Protestant Everyman morality plays. And then came the Comics Code Authority, which destroyed the comic book industry as a medium and devolved it into a “capes” genre for kiddies (this example is more relevant than ever).

     And then came the “Satanic Panic” of the late 1970s through the early 1990s. In the 1970s the social fabric was seeming to unravel (give or take a “Spirit of ‘76” bicentennial moment or two) with bands like Motorhead, ZZ Top, and Ted Nugent openly singing about “jailbait”, hardcore legal child pornography in many European nations, and the normalization of divorce and “swinging”.   This was a serious problem and social conservatives are indeed responsible to helping stave off the worse of this degeneracy and saving the U.S. from the Great Secularization that hit most of Western Europe and much of the non-European Anglosphere… and why the U.S. still hasn’t joined those who fell later on.

     But fighting the culture wars where they need to be fought was hard, didn’t bring in financial support, and didn’t bring praise to inflate the egos of many who would fight such culture wars. Instead they picked fights with innocent abet easier targets: Heavy Metal, Dungeons & Dragons, and… daycare centers. The former two had fantasy elements labeled as “Satanic” and were deemed to be the root cause of innocents being seduced to evil, while the later of the three fell to a “Pizzagate” style child abuse accusations that ruined many innocents’ lives.

     But unlike earlier moral panics which had a successful, even if temporary, success, the “Satanic Panic” for the most part only made the social conservatives and religious right seem as fools. The consequence of this was that by the time the Hawaiian Supreme Court in the mid-1990s pulled their Xanatos Gambit which led to the Obergefell decicion.

     The consequences of overreach, sooner or later, is that by attempting to connect actual serious problems with anything they dislike, they will not convince people who would rightfully have problems with the former to now hate the later, but rather convince people who look at the later and see something that only a fanatical puritan would hate and assume that anything they dislike is of a similar nature.

     As someone who lived through the “Satanic Panic”, your humble author feels that it may be happening again. Oh, there is the “National Conservative” demand that we stop loving libertarian free speech and, in a manly way, silence enemies and their icky messages which induce wrongthink, just as there are those who demand that “H8 Speech” be banned because itinduces… wrongthink.

     A clear example of this conflation comes from a The Daily Signal article by Tony Kinnett. Much of the article quite rightfully goes after LGBTQ&c. propagans that tries to normalize kinky sex and transgenersim amongst elementary school children and earlier—often as part of formal classroom teaching materials—but conflates that with a Seinen Japanese Manga that has nothing to do with wokeness, LGBTQ&c. ideology, or even promoting anything sexually deviant (or really anything sexual at all).

Pictured: Social Conservatives & Religious Right suddenly having to deal with the greater threat that they weren’t fighting against.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Fighting Mandatory DEI Support in California

     Universities and colleges have increasingly demanded “diversity statements” to suss out thoughtcriminals, if not outright demanding fealty to the “DEI” agenda.   Some states’ legislatures have fought back, but in California, it is the people who must fight back against their own government.

“A policy that requires scholars seeking a job at UC Santa Cruz to provide a diversity, equity and inclusion statement as part of the application process is unconstitutional, argues a recently filed lawsuit against the University of California system and UCSC leaders.

“The Pacific Legal Foundation filed the lawsuit on behalf of J.D. Haltigan, a former University of Toronto psychology professor, who argues the university’s DEI statement requirement runs afoul of the First Amendment because it requires Haltigan ‘to express ideas with which he disagrees in order to be eligible for employment.’

“The lawsuit states UC Santa Cruz applicants “must express agreement with specific socio-political ideas, including the view that treating individuals differently based on their race or sex is desirable.’”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (June 5th, 2023)

 

News of the Week for June 5th, 2023


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (June 5th, 2023)

     The server that hosts The Political Hat Blog is suffering from technical issues so there might be problems viewing this site and/or downtime where nothing will be accessible.

     Update: All fixed now.

Posted on by The Political Hat | Comments Off on Website Problems

Transgendering The Fetus

     According to the Left, the pre-born aren’t persons have no rights… except, apparently, the “right” to be genderqueer.

“A professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine who is involved in a LGBTQ+ ‘special interest group’ claimed that parents must start including gender ideology in their families before a baby is born.

“‘This is my favorite topic,’ =Lauren T. Roth, a professor of pediatrics at Einstein and a physician in the division of academic general pediatrics at the Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, said. The doctor has specialized knowledge of transgender medical interventions on children diagnosed with dysphoria.

“‘Like, this is a normal thing. And we have to understand that gender is on a spectrum. There’s not just men and women,’ she said. ‘Sometimes [a child’s gender identity] matches the chromosomes or the genitals that they were born with, but sometimes it doesn’t.’”

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Transgendering The Fetus

Quick Takes – For The Crime Of Misgendering: Prohibited From Teaching; Upersoning Monty Python; Prosecuted For Objecting To A Male Breastfeeding

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: The systemic privilege of imposing queer totalitarianism.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Be accused of misgendering someone and lose you job… especially when that job is teaching.

“A Christian teacher has been banned from the profession for ‘misgendering’ a pupil in a case believed to be the first of its kind in the UK.

“Joshua Sutcliffe, 33, was ruled by the Teaching Regulation Authority (TRA) to have failed to treat a pupil with ‘dignity and respect’. He was also found to have failed to protect the pupil’s wellbeing when he did not use the preferred pronouns of a girl who identified as a boy.

“Mr Sutcliffe, a former maths teacher at The Cherwell School, a state secondary in Oxford, admitted he did not use the pupil’s preferred pronouns when he praised a group of pupils during a maths lesson by stating, ‘well done girls’. He claimed that this was not intentional and that he apologised immediately.

“The TRA found it was “more probable than not” that he publicly referred to the transgender pupil using female pronouns on other occasions while working at the school between 2015 and 2018, which Mr Sutcliffe denied.”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Leviathan’s School Meals

     The state, Leviathan, considers all children to be not the parents’ but Leviathans. One of the ways Leviathan lays claim is in the name of “equity” and “equalization”. Good parents that can and do provide a good childhood for their children are considered monsters because it lays bare the consequences of bad parenting and the consequences thereof.

     Of course any decent society does not blame a child for their own upbringing, which is why it is moral for a society to not blame the child but more importantly provide positive examples to live by and the basic needs and education for such children to achieve beyond the limitations of their birth.

In any immoral society, the insane desire for leveling of opportunities results in punishing people lead socially constructive lives while subsidizing those who don’t.

     Any guess which of those two the Left wishes to support?

     Guess no longer.

“Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), and Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.), along with 15 colleagues in the Senate and 68 in the House of Representatives, today introduced legislation that provides a permanent solution to end child hunger in schools by offering free breakfast, lunch, dinner, and a snack to all students, preschool through high school, regardless of income, eliminating all school meal debt, and strengthening local economies by incentivizing local food procurement.

“The Universal School Meals Program Act of 2023 builds on the highly successful universal free school meals program that Congress funded to combat the spike in child and youth hunger brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. While various efforts were made to bolster and extend the program since 2020, it expired in September 2022 leaving nearly 30 million children who rely on free or reduced-price lunch in a state of uncertainty and strain.”

Pictured: School lunches under the dictates of Bernie Sanders, Nomenklatura.

     But while some focus on the increasing Federalization of schools or the price tag attached, the most important goal is to end being able to demonstrate the benefits of good parenting and living a good life (i.e. being able to provide your own child with food) while hiding the negative effects of bad parenting and living a bad life (i.e. needing to put your kid on government handouts). This does nothing but encourage the worst behavior while punishing the best.

     That is how you destroy any good and decent society.

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Leviathan’s School Meals

The Orwellian Erasure Of Women

      Orwell suggested that if you take away any word to describe a concept then people will be unable to think of such a concept. While overly simplistic an understanding of what Orwell was talking about in the novel “1984”, the Left is trying to push this concept further to denying basic biological reality. However, unlike a mere concept or even the idea of a thing, they are trying to erase a biological reality that does not care about word games or what one can or can not conceive of. But still, they will erase the very ability to even talk about the very existence of biological males and biological females.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Orwellian Erasure Of Women

Teaching Racial Hate In California

Meanwhile, in a California Ethnic Studies Class…

      Just as soon as you thought students in California were safe from social justice studies, like chanting to Aztec gods, they come out with two “ethnic-studies” curricula that enshrine Critical Race Theory and a pedagogy of praxis.

      First is “Ethnic Studies: World Geography” which presumes a social Marxist style oppressor/oppressed dynamic with the assumption that Europeans who came to America and the indigenous groups were the innocent oppressed… despite the fact that the Aztec and Inca empires were some of the most brutal, murderous, and oppressive empires known to mankind with many native people flocking to the Spaniards as liberators. It also teaches to non-White students that they are oppressed and if they don’t think so they will be taught to be!

“Ethnic Studies: World Geography is a full-year social-studies course for high-school students in the district, and its stated purpose is to study “political and social hegemonies between cultures of power and indigenous groups” as a way to “develop empathy for individuals and groups as well as to challenge established stereotypes and Eurocentric perspectives of disputes between cultures of power and populations.”

“‘Essential questions’ posed to students throughout the course include: ‘How do insecurities in regards [sic] to self-image affect communities of color?’; ‘What role does white privilege play in the disenfranchisement of the perspectives and challenges of communities of color?’; ‘What [are] examples of racism, colorism, or white supremacy in your daily life around Santa Ana?’”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment