News of the Week (November 5th, 2017)

 

News of the Week for Nov. 5th, 2017


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (November 5th, 2017)

There Can Be Only One (Galaxiegender)

     One special little Tumblr snowflake will be very, very upset with you if you dare claim to be the same admittedly-made-up gender:

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – The Campus Soviet: The Innocent Are Guilty; The Real Guilty Shall Be Protected; You Deserved It Anyway

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: You can trust US, comrade!

     First, a little bit of mood music:

     Carrying on…

     On college campuses, men are guilty, even if their purported victims claim otherwise:

“A former football player was ‘railroaded’ by a ‘rogue’ Title IX office at the University of Southern California, according to a surprising source — his alleged ‘victim.’

“Zoe Katz, the captain of USC’s women’s tennis team, is accusing the university of not only ignoring her protestations that her boyfriend Matt Boermeester didn’t assault her, but threatening her for speaking up.”

     Further, Miss Katz noted the pressure on her to lie:

“‘I was told that I must be afraid of Matt, which I definitely was not and am not,” Katz wrote in her statement denouncing USC. ‘When I told the truth about Matt, in repeated interrogations, I was stereotyped and was told I must be a “battered” woman, and that made me feel demeaned and absurdly profiled.’

“Instead she fears ‘further’ retaliation from USC’s Title IX office, which she says isolated her by prohibiting her from speaking with Boermeester and even her own friends”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

An Epitome of Social Engineering

     A “thought experiment” from two psychology professors have come to the conclusion that the way to utopia lies in taking babies away from mothers the moment they are born and then substituting a mother’s own child with a substitute.

     Herein below, is a fisking that article, “If babies were randomly allocated to families would racism end.”

“Imagine a world in which all the babies born each day were randomly redistributed among the biological parents. The infant assigned to any given set of parents could be white, black, Asian, Hispanic, Native American, or any combination thereof (and that’s just the US); the baby could be perfectly healthy or grossly deformed. Parents would know only that their child was not their biological child. Let us call this social mixing.

“Is the idea so frightening? Yes it is. It is a frightening thought that your own biological child, the one sitting there now doing her homework, might have gone to an impoverished mother or a drug addict, perhaps have been beaten, perhaps starved. But why, save for genetic chauvinism, do we view with comparative equanimity the everyday reality of other people’s children subject to the same treatment by their own biological mothers?”

     Could it be that we as a species evolved by concentrating our resources on our genetic offspring because we are genetically programmed to pass on our genes and insure that they are passed on thereafter, due to the simple fact that those that didn’t had their lineages go extinct.

“You may argue that genetic bias is indelible in human nature. Social mixing would not only disturb the comfort of this fatalistic attitude, but also use genetic chauvinism for ends beyond mere economic equality, providing grounds for a compassion that goes beyond the well being of our immediate families. Since any man might be your biological brother, any woman your biological sister, concern for them would have to be expressed by a concern for a common good.”

     Or perhaps people won’t care because regardless of how they treat the child they are given, their own kid won’t be effected. Heck, if you can’t even raise your own kid, why bother having kids to begin with? Sure, adoptive parents care, but they are not having their own children taken away in order to adopt.

” A second effect of social mixing would be to generate a strong interest in the health and wellbeing of expectant mothers, which would ultimately translate into an interest in the social and biological welfare of everyone. Since any child might end up our own, we would provide the social and educational environments that would best enhance their development. Ghettos and slums would be an eyesore for us all. Poverty, drug, and alcohol addiction are already everyone’s problem, but this fact would be more meaningful than it is now. The child of that addict might be our biological child. Every victim of a drive-by shooting might be a member of our genetic family. Each of us would see the link between our fate and the fate of others.”

     On the contrary, it would mean mothers have every incentive to make to make maternal care worse for everyone else so that their own flesh and blood will be better off.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Happy Halloween! (2017)

     Here is the silent classic, “The Phantom Carriage”.

     May it bring you respite from the endless 24 hour news cycle…

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Why Hate Speech IS Free Speech

     Free speech, as noted elsewhere, comes down to a definition of terms:

“For a free people used to the protections of the 1st Amendment, free speech means that the government can’t punish you for expressing your opinion. In this brave new world, however, free speech means that the government won’t punish you for expressing an opinion it hasn’t prohibited.”

     Still some try to justify censorship even under the former definition by declaring “hate speech” to be literal violence, while the potential of literal violence in enforcing this censorship is an enshrinement of free speech!

     A fisking of one such attempt:

“Freedom in a free society is supposed to be for all. Therefore, freedom rules out imposing on the freedom of others. You are free to walk down the street, but not to keep others from doing so.

“The imposition on the freedom of others can come in overt, immediate physical form — thugs coming to attack with weapons. Violence may be a kind of expression, but it certainly is not ‘free speech.'”

     True enough so far. A presentation of a clear and present danger is not an act of any legitimate right.

“Like violence, hate speech can also be a physical imposition on the freedom of others. That is because language has a psychological effect imposed physically — on the neural system, with long-term crippling effects.”

     So, “hate speech” is like some Bene Gesserit use of “the Voice” or a Jedi mind trick?

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | 3 Comments

News of the Week (October 29th, 2017)

 

News of the Week for Oct. 29th, 2017


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | 1 Comment

Legal Immigrant on the 2nd Amendment

     With all the enemies (both foreign and domestic) of the Bill of Rights, especially the 2nd Amendment, it is heartening when a legal immigrant demonstrates what far to many native born Americans can not grok.

Continue reading

Posted in Gun Rights | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – Opposing Social Unjust Institutions: Food, Fighting, and Faith

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: All within social justice, nothing outside social justice, nothing against social justice.

     First, a little bit of mood music:

     Carrying on…

     In a free market system, food is efficiently distributed and fresh fruit and veggies are available all year round regardless of where you live. Apparently this is racist.

“Students at the University of Washington recently hosted a ‘teach-in’ on how America’s ‘food system is built on racism.’

“A student organization known as ‘Husky Real Food Challenge,’ a chapter of a ‘national campaign that leverages the power of youth and universities to create a healthy, fair, and sustainable food system,’ hosted Tuesday’s event to demonstrate how the food industry is ‘built on racism.’

“‘We know the title of our teach-in is proactive,’ organizers of the event concede, but insist that the title is ‘far from symbolic’ since ‘it is a fact that today inmates, predominantly black Americans, harvest a lot of the food that we eat for less than $.50/hr.'”

     Does this mean we don’t need all those agricultural “guest workers”?

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Governor Moonbeam’s Stopped Clock

     It’s that time again. Yes, that time when California’s clock stops on a reprieve from the status quo insanity thanks to Gov. Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown’s “moment of clarity” (as an alcoholic would call it).

     Surprisingly, Gov. Moonbeam vetoes a law that would have enshrined the campus Star Chambers and their Kangaroo Courts in California’s tripartite post-secondary education system. From his veto message for SB 169:

“Since this law was enacted, however, thoughtful legal minds have increasingly questioned whether federal and state actions to prevent and redress sexual harassment and assault – well-intentioned as they are – have also unintentionally resulted in some colleges’ failure to uphold due process for accused students. Depriving any student of higher education opportunities should not be done lightly, or out of fear of losing state or federal funding.

“Given the strong state of our laws already, I am not prepared to codify additional requirements in reaction to a shifting federal landscape, when we haven’t yet ascertained the full impact of what we recently enacted. We have no insight into how many formal investigations result in expulsion, what circumstances lead to expulsion, or whether there is disproportionate impact on race or ethnicity. We may need more statutory requirements than what this bill contemplates. We may need fewer . Or still yet, we may need simply to fine tune what we have.”

     Gov. Moonbeam is (finally) termed out and California will have the chance to elect a hard-core Leftist without any of the mental or emotional aversion that Moonbeam had to have when he first ran for office about half-a-century ago.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment