Artificial Wombs Mean One Thing: Cyborg Catgirl Mommies

     The once science fiction possibility of growing super-soldiers in artificial wombs may soon become a real possibility, if researches in Communist China have their way.

“Scientists in China created an AI robot system that cares for human embryos growing in artificial wombs […]

“When we think of AI-monitored humans in artificial wombs we think of the dystopian sci-fi future presented in ‘The Matrix’. However, the researchers behind the very real project believe their new system will be a force for good that will help to boost China’s population — the country is currently dealing with its lowest birth rate in six decades.

“The team, from Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology in China’s eastern Jiangsu province, designed the robot to constantly monitor and care for human embryos by adjusting the nutrition, carbon dioxide, and other important factors in the artificial embryos. They claim the new robot-assisted artificial womb is a safer and more efficient method for growing embryos than a natural womb, though no human trials have been conducted so far.”

     And yes, they are the AI to select which embryos will be destroyed and which will be selected for.

“The researchers, who outlined their project in a paper in the Journal of Biomedical Engineering, explained how it could rank embryos based on their development potential. The paper also described how the scientists have already tested their system on animal embryos.”

     Do they want a Butlearian Jihad? Because this is how you get a Butlerian Jihad.

     The obvious solution to this that would prevent an AI, or a Communist, from using this for evil is to combine this melding of the biological and the artificial with the melding of biological and the artificial in the form of cyborg catgirls?

Pictured: Mommy.

Continue reading

Posted in Science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Rhode Island And Teacher Prerogatives

     Won’t any one think of the cult indoctrinators educators? Rhode Island certainly is, including protecting teachers to indoctrinate as they see fit free from effective control of parents, principles, and school board.   H7538 (2022) declares that teachers have a right to not be “upbraid[ed]” by not just parents and students, but “other citizens” as well.

(5) To not be subject to harassment, abusive language, and/or upbraiding by parents, other citizens, students and/or other school employees;

     Oh, there are quips bout teachers not having to pay for classroom materials out of pocket, but between subsections like that there are those that declare their authority and opinion must be respected, that they can report throughcrime, and that they can they can’t be limited as teacher in “presenting and interpreting facts and ideas concerning people, human society, the physical and biological world, and other branches of learning”.

(13) To have their authority respected which is essential to creating an environment conducive to learning, effective instruction in the classroom, and proper administration of public schools;

(14) To have their professional judgment and discretion respected;

(15) To report any errant, offensive, or abusive content or behavior of students to school officials or appropriate agencies;

(16) To academic freedom which shall be guaranteed to employees, and no special limitations shall be placed upon study, investigation, presenting and interpreting facts and ideas concerning people, human society, the physical and biological world, and other branches of learning subject to accepted standards of professional responsibility;

     Oh, and teachers rant and rave any opinion they want with “full freedom” afforded to them.

(18) To be afforded full freedom in expressing personal opinions on all matters relevant to course content, so long as the teacher makes every effort to indicate that they are speaking personally and not on behalf of the school, its administration, or the board;

     Any bets this will protect a teacher from preaching about how White students are morally guilty just be existing or to push “transitioning” children… but not allow a teacher to say there are only two sexes?

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Rhode Island And Teacher Prerogatives

     Mark Levin recently spoke at the 2020 CPAC. Your humble author has disagreed with Mark Levin before, and does not completely agree with what Levis says here. However, Mr. Levin has made some rather salient remarks about Americanism vs. “mob-ocracy” populism and autocratic nationalism. His full appearance can be seen below.

Posted on by The Political Hat | 1 Comment

Trudeau: As Foretold In Prophesy

     Over seven years ago, in the before-time known as “2014”, the Huffington Post, of all places, outright predicted that “Canada Will Become a Dictatorship Under Trudeau”.

“The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him. Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision? Let’s hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Trudeau: As Foretold In Prophesy

What Are Preteen Students Learning In Minneapolis? Learning How To Take To The Streets For Black Lives Matter!

     Forget the “3 Rs”, the real learning experience is all about how to act when you get arrested by police for when your “peaceful” protest turns into a violent street action!

     Oh, and I’m sure this creepy “STEAM” teacher has nothing to do with any of this or in anyway influenced the spontaneous racial uprisings… right?

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (February 27th, 2022)

 

News of the Week for Feb. 27th, 2022


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | 1 Comment

Firing Line Friday: Bias in the Press

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The problem of a biased mainstream news media is nothing new, as William F. Buckley, Jr. discusses with Midge Decter and Russ Braley.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: Bias in the Press

Quick Takes – Lawsuit Madness: Remington Caves; Palin Dismissed; Prince Andrew Settles

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: …and justice for none.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Gunmakers are legally protected from being sued for the misuse of their products. But an aggressive lawyers and a loophole or two is enough for Remington to fork over $73,000,000.

“The suit was first filed against the company in 2014. Claiming wrongful death, the plaintiffs accused Remington of engaging in deceptive marketing tactics in promoting the firearm as a hyper-masculine weapon. One Remington ad depicted the gun with the words: ‘Consider Your Man Card Reissued.’ The gunmaker denied a casual relationship between the advertising strategy and the tragedy.

“…

“While federal law shields gun manufacturers from some wrongful death litigation, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Remington was not immune from liability on the matter of its marketing practices. Remington appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which dismissed the opportunity to review the case.”

Continue reading

Posted in Gun Rights, Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Quick Takes – Lawsuit Madness: Remington Caves; Palin Dismissed; Prince Andrew Settles

The Degenerate Dialectic

     It become increasingly obvious to more and more that the seeming double-standard of the Left is actually a single standard of the “heads I win tails you lose variety”. However, it would be to simplistic and unfortunate to chalk it up to mere selfishness. Beneath every double standard is a single standard a person, or at least a person’s chosen ideology, holds to.

     In the case of gender identity, as it is with race or other collectivist identity, it is a dialectical one… of sorts.

     Hegelian dialectic, as reviled as it may be, was still a method to get to the truth, not a truth itself, let alone a proscriptive or even deductive determiner of the future that it degenerated into beginning with Marx and continuing abasement into a faith based belief of being on “the right side of history”. An example of this can be seen in modern “gender theory”, specifically Critical Gender Theory, from which gender is a social construct and a non-essence that acts like an essence.

     In the woke dialectic—the 19th Century’s dialectic degenerate decedent—the thesis is the invented social construct of “cis-heteronormativity” sustained by a system of oppression that is imposed on society, thus creating form and effect.   The antithesis is the equal and opposite imposition of “trans-homonormativity” that must be imposed by deconstruction systems of oppression.   The synthesis, then is not the prior unknown result of applying antithesis to thesis, but the immanentized eschaton that the antithesis is constructed and thus derived from.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Degenerate Dialectic

The New Year Zero

     The Left wants—needs—to “disrupt, dismantle, and deconstructeverything because their utopian scheme requires working from year zero.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment