Quick Takes – Euthanasia Expanding Everywhere: Extreme Laws In France; A Human Right In Estonia; MAID For Kids in Manitoba

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Everywhere death spreads, normalized.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

Death, Rx

     France seems to be hell bent on going all out with euthanasia, or nearly so.

“French MPs are preparing to vote on a law that would legalise euthanasia and assisted suicide. In the final days of the parliamentary debate, as the proposal’s provisions were reviewed, some of the most outrageous articles were discussed and, unfortunately, many were adopted.

“For several days, the voices denouncing the text have been growing. The proposal that MPs are preparing to vote on will make France one of the most permissive countries in this area, alongside countries that have sunk into increasingly serious abuses of ‘assisted dying,’ such as Canada and Belgium.

“Based on the model that already exists for abortion, a ‘crime of obstruction’ has been created, which will allow the prosecution of anyone who wishes to prevent or attempt to prevent euthanasia, whether by action, words, or access to information. Deterring a suffering loved one from receiving a lethal injection could earn you up to two years in prison and a €30,000 fine. The penalty sought is even larger than the one for abortion.

“Conversely, the symmetrical possibility of a ‘crime of incitement to euthanasia,’ i.e., the act of pushing someone to request death, has not been retained, even though experience in other countries has shown that psychological, family, and financial pressures abound for those who are considering assisted suicide.”

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Blowing Up The Rules

     Increasingly, we are seeing more and more people declare that “there are no rules” and that we must “fight like the Left” to the point of adopting Leftist thinking and frameworks, both of which are necessary prerequisites to engage in “tactics” of Gramsci, Marcuse, or Alinsky. The line of “thinking” is that everything has already been blown up by the Left so that we have to “join ‘em to beat ‘em” at their own game. That this ignores the little fact that the “rules for radicals” or “repressive tolerance” are tailor made to achieve goals antithetical to America seems beyond too many who foolishly believe that they can highjack the immanentization to steer it towards their own chosen eschaton, by sheer manliness or oracular intervention.

     To put it bluntly, NO, Marx or his pseudo-intellectual dependents did not have any “good ideas” or any “good points”/insights into society or power. In reality, the adoption of Leftist thinking is nothing less than a triumph for the Left, for the Right has become them… the debate merely one of who is the bolshevik and who is the menshevik.

     What the Gramscians did is replace the old with their framework via the “Long March Through The Institutions”, waiting for the Right get frustrated and toss out “the rules”. The Right only had superficial normalcy left; without those rules, they had only that new framework left—the framework of, by, and for the Left.

     Totalitarian is, ultimately, in the mind, and one can’t break free because of internal capture, and nothing underlying to replace it. The superficial means nothing, at that point, at least nothing of true value or worth.

     Many on the Right, purported or otherwise, only opposed things because they were outside that superficial layer of normalcy. It was alien only because it was alien and due to the momentum and habit, once it became normal in society it became normal for them individually, because the underlying fundamentals upon which lay “normalcy” had changed.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Blowing Up The Rules

Washington State’s War On Clergy

     Privilege communications are generally excluded from admissible evidence and those individuals who receive such privilege communications are exempt from being forced to testify in trials or otherwise give evidence. There are arguments that at least in some cases, such privilege should not be allowed.

     However, the state of Washington’s approach is now to affirm that privilege… with the explicitly called out exception of members of the clergy. HB 5375 explicitly excluded clergy from the allowance given to privileged communications. The law was amended to, in part, read, with deleted text in strikeout text and new text underlined:

“((No)) Except for members of the clergy, no one shall be 11 required to report under this section when he or she obtains the 12 information solely as a result of a privileged communication as 13 provided in RCW 5.60.060.”

     They were further explicitly added to the limited list of mandated reporters:

“(1)(a) When any member of the clergy, practitioner, county 25 coroner or medical examiner, law enforcement officer, professional 26 school personnel, registered or licensed nurse, social service 27 counselor, psychologist, pharmacist, employee of the department of 28 children, youth, and families, licensed or certified child care 29 providers or their employees, employee of the department of social 30 and health services, juvenile probation officer, diversion unit 31 staff, placement and liaison specialist, responsible living skills 32 program staff, HOPE center staff, state family and children’s ombuds 33 or any volunteer in the ombuds’ office, or host home program has 34 reasonable cause to believe that a child has suffered abuse or 35 neglect, he or she shall report such incident, or cause a report to 36 be made, to the proper law enforcement agency or to the department as 37 provided in RCW 26.44.040.”

     If this were a more general revision, then whether such revision were inclusive regardless of religious elements, that’s be a different discussion. But this is specifically targeting people based on religion.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (June 1st, 2025)

 

News of the Week for June 1st, 2025


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (June 1st, 2025)

Firing Line Friday: Three Approaches to Terrorists

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     From Al Qaeda on 9/11 to Hamas on 10/7, and far too much in between, the 21st Century has been as rife with terrorism as the 20th. Let us look back forty years ago where the question of what to do about terrorism is debated by William F. Buckley, Jr., Brian Michael Jenkins, E. C. Ackerman, Ariel Merari, and three approaches to terrorists discussed.

     Until next Friday.

Posted in War & Terror | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Woke Way Of Thinking

     Wokeness is a way of thinking and a framework built on false premises whereby any analyses stemming therefrom are fundamentally flawed. Ultimately, it is designed to steer one to a predetermined conclusion, with only the details to be filled in, like some type of philosophical MadLibs. For example:

     In it’s ultimate form, it is Kyriarchy, which could be said to be “Critical Consciousness to intersecting systems of oppression”. And wokeness is wokeness regardless of which classes/groups are in which part of the MadLibs.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Violating The 2nd Amendment For Wrongthink, Ex Post Facto

     In the United States of America, it is not a crime to commit “wrongthink” and you can’t have your inalienable rights taken away because of it. However you can have your rights stripped away because your commission of “wrongthink” made a crime worse and and made you eligible for stripping you of your rights when merely being convicted of the crime, per se, could not. SB 89, which has just been passed by the Nevada Legislature, does exactly that, and reads in part:

202.360 1. A person shall not purchase, own or have in his or her possession or under his or her custody or control any firearm if the person

[…]

(g) Has been convicted of committing or attempting to commit a hate crime involving violence

     But oh, it gets worse, especially for people who don’t even commit any included crime in the future…

     The bill declares that you don’t even have to be convicted of a crime in Nevada, for Nevada to strip you of your Constitutional Right within the state:

(2) An offense under the laws of the United States or any state, territory or district:

(I) An element of which is that the conduct of the offender was motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of another person or group of persons; or

(II) For which a court of competent jurisdiction imposed an additional penalty pursuant to a finding that the conduct of the offender was motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of another person or group of persons.

     But at least this won’t be retroactive, because ex post facto laws are Unconstitutional, right?

      Continue reading

Posted in Gun Rights | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

     Due to being abnormally busy over the next two weekends, there will be no “News of the Week” this upcoming Sunday or the Sunday thereafter.  Posting will otherwise be light.

Posted on by The Political Hat | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – Gaia’s Rights Get Moist: Whale Rights; Rivers Are People Too; Unalienable Great Lakes

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Water, water everywhere, nor any rights to keep.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Whale rights are all the rage in New Zealand…

“The initiative, Te Mana o Te Tohorā (The Enduring Power of Whales), aims to establish whales as legal persons, granting them rights that recognise their ecological importance and sentience. Developed in collaboration with the Pacific Whale Fund and Ocean Vision Legal, the project represents a significant step forward for the giants of the ocean in environmental law.

“The proposed legislation builds on the He Whakaputanga Moana (Ocean Declaration), a treaty signed by Pacific Indigenous leaders earlier this year, which first granted whales and dolphins legal personhood in the Pacific Islands.

“Simmons & Simmons, which has been supporting the project pro bono, hopes the frameworks will pave the way for nations to adopt similar protections, bridging Indigenous environmental values with global legal systems.

“These frameworks centre on the concept of a ‘legal person’ — an entity acknowledged as having ‘standing’ within the judicial system. Traditionally, this status has been reserved for humans, community organisations, and corporations. Granting this designation to whales represents a groundbreaking shift, acknowledging the value of non-human life and redefining how the law engages with the natural world.

“‘This legislation challenges traditional legal frameworks by recognising whales as sentient beings with intrinsic value,’ said Rob Allen, a partner at Simmons & Simmons. ‘It builds on existing protections for cetaceans, offering a more comprehensive approach to safeguarding their habitats and acknowledging their complex ecological roles.’”

     Captain Ahab hardest hit.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Alienation And The Mythologies Of Fascism And Communism

     Leftist ideology preys on the weak, offering balm to lost souls. In fact, “core of both Fascism and Communism as radical ideologies is a sense of alienation” as James Lindsay noted and further opines upon the subject, which is quoted in full full below due to the limitations of Twitter/X embeds.

On alienation and the mythologies of Fascism and Communism. Long post/:

At the core of both Fascism and Communism as radical ideologies is a sense of alienation. In fact, it’s alienation with the injustice of the alienation turned up to 11. This alienation breeds resentment, envy, and radical politics itself.

First, a word about radical politics. What does “radical” mean? It means “at the roots,” or more accurately, tearing out the roots of the existing system to replace them with a new system with totally different roots.

Second, a few words about alienation and the Alien force that alienates. Alienation here ultimately refers to the idea of being made an alien to your own circumstance. That is, there’s a circumstance that fits you, and you belong in that circumstance by some right, and you are removed or estranged from it.

This is usually believed to be the result of having been (actively) alienated because it is generally assumed people would not intentionally remove themselves from their own rightful context. The outside, interloping force that removes the alienated subject from his rightful context and circumstance is an Alien power. It doesn’t recognize the circumstance or people’s rightful claim to it and its inheritance but comes in from outside and imposes itself into and over that circumstance to usurp it for itself.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment