Happy π Day everyone!
Here is a song to help you memorize the number Pi (or at least the first 25 digits thereof).
Happy π Day everyone!
Here is a song to help you memorize the number Pi (or at least the first 25 digits thereof).

We have already seen how publishing companies have tried to stealth edit the works of the late authors Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming, reminiscent of the novel “1984” and it’s MiniTru “memory hole”. Now, they aren’t even bothering to wait until the author is dead, as R. L. Stine found out.
“Children’s horror author R.L. Stine accused his publisher of editing his popular Goosebumps series for potentially offensive material without his involvement.
“The Times reported last week that Scholastic was reissuing Goosebumps books and changing references to weight, ethnicity, and more that could be deemed offensive. This followed publishers making edits to the works of other popular authors, including the late Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming.
“The Times initially reported that Stine was working with Scholastic on the edits, but the author revealed on Twitter that he was in fact not involved.
“Responding to a fan reacting with disappointment at the reports, Stine tweeted, ‘Lindsey, the stories aren’t true. I’ve never changed a word in Goosebumps. Any changes were never shown to me.’”
But why stop there?

Previously, Texas saw legislation introduced to ban “Diversity”, “Inclusion”, and “Equity” (AKA “DEI”, or more accurately the “DIE” agenda) offices or officers. Now Iowa is following the same path. HF 616 (formerly HSB 218) says, in part:
“A public institution of higher education shall not expend any moneys appropriated by the general assembly or any other moneys derived from bequests, charges, deposits, donations, endowments, fees, grants, gifts, income, receipts, tuition, or any other source to establish, sustain, support, or staff a diversity, equity, and inclusion office, or to contract, employ, engage, or hire an individual to serve as a diversity, equity, and inclusion officer.”
They define their terns thus:
“1. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion” includes all of the following:
a. Any effort to manipulate or otherwise influence the composition of the faculty or student body with reference to race, sex, color, or ethnicity, apart from ensuring colorblind and sex-neutral admissions and hiring in accordance with state and federal anti-discrimination laws.
b. Any effort to promote differential treatment of or provide special benefits to individuals on the basis of race, color, or ethnicity.
c. Any effort to promote or promulgate policies and procedures designed or implemented with reference to race, color, or ethnicity.
d. Any effort to promote or promulgate trainings, programming, or activities designed or implemented with reference to race, color, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
e. Any effort to promote, as the official position of the public institution of higher education, a particular, widely contested opinion referencing unconscious or implicit bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgender ideology, microaggressions, group marginalization, anti-racism, systemic oppression, social justice, intersectionality, neo-pronouns, heteronormativity, disparate impact, gender theory, racial privilege, sexual privilege, or any related formulation of these concepts.“Diversity, equity, and inclusion office” means any division, office, center, or other unit of a public institution of higher education that is responsible for creating, developing, designing, implementing, organizing, planning, or promoting policies, programming, training, practices, activities, or procedures related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. […]
“[…]
“3. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion officer” means an individual who is either employed by a public institution of higher education or who is an independent contractor of a public institution of higher education and whose duties include coordinating, creating, developing, designing, implementing, organizing, planning, or promoting policies, programming, training, practices, activities, and procedures relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion. […]”
News of the Week for March 12th, 2023
In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.
Just what’s going on with America? Good? Bad? Questions about America, both different and interestingly the same, were asked half a century ago by Dee Wells, Anthony Howard, and Louis Heren of William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Republic of South Africa was supposed to be a diverse multi-ethnic and multi-racial progressive democracy complete with restorative justice that was supposed to lead to a utopia with flowering meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children dance and laugh and play with gumdrop smiles.

Turns out that letting Communist oriented corrupt kleptocracy whose experience was based on terrorism would result in the destruction of an entire nation and a hell on Earth for all races and ethnicities… some more than others.
1. South Africa has collapsed. US embassy is now informing international travellers to stock up (prepper style) on food and water. https://t.co/WLfG88D0Uj
— #zombieland (@k9_reaper) February 26, 2023
Some may insist on a false dilemma fallacy that it was a choice between Apartheid and this, from both the champions of the former and the later. That Botswana, lead by Black Africans and surrounded by former White dominated countries for decades, is one of the most successful and least corrupt countries in Africa belies that false dichotomy. This isn’t about race… it’s about anti-racism being used as the excuse for greed, power, and incompetence.
The Woke Left like to talk about “systems of oppression” and how racism, sexism, &c. is “systemic”. This is, of course, projection. The real “system of oppression” is the “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (i.e. the “DIE” agenda), and it is as systemic as can be.
DOCUMENTS: Through a records request, I have acquired the University of Missouri's rubric for evaluating diversity statements.
As usual, the rubric proves the critics' point: DEI evaluations invite viewpoint discrimination. pic.twitter.com/5FX9dCTg0e
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
As it turns out, Mizzou routinely uses diversity statements in hiring.
According to its Inclusive Excellence Plan, the College of Arts and Science has expanded its use of the statements. The college of agriculture has committed to using them for “all faculty applications.” pic.twitter.com/9evwgIC4Ro
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
Ah, the privilege of being the totalitarian ideology that controls actual “systems”.
Mizzou’s Division of Biological Sciences (why is it always biology?) heavily weighs diversity statements.
Its website advertises its “equal weighting of the research, teaching, and inclusion and equity statements" in the first round of faculty job application reviews. pic.twitter.com/oc3fhTSXTj
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
Meanwhile, Mizzou’s training on “Best Practice for Inclusive Excellence in Faculty Hiring” encourages hiring committees to assess job candidates’ contributions to DEI using a pre-established rubric. pic.twitter.com/v9Fk4YeeJf
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
Again, the Mizzou rubric I obtained through a FOIA request perfectly illustrates how diversity statement policies invite viewpoint discrimination. pic.twitter.com/QhyG5gjZ6W
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
By now, it should be obvious that diversity statements will inevitably function as ideological litmus tests—and huge failures of priority.
Unfortunately, they’re alive and well at the University of Missouri.
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
Read the full story, and take a look at the rubric, at @MindingCampus. Through top-quality research and reporting, we're documenting the ways that DEI has invaded higher education to the detriment of our public and private universities.https://t.co/75vIlErdaP
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) February 23, 2023
Academia is the faunt of madness that has infected the institutions through þe olde “long march”.
![]()
“Equity” is the nice sounding word that the Woke Left use to cover-up their fundamental transformation of America into a post-Marxist post-Immanentized Eschaton. And you know what whey they slap on an adjective, that which the adjective represents is now a target for “enwokening”.
1/
The CDC decided to make *Health Equity* core to its mission, and says that means advocating for:-Free internet access
-Free access to bikes
-Policy changes in housingThis is the Woke and weaponized bureaucracy at work.
So, let's talk about what's going on here
A thread🧵 pic.twitter.com/MU4ajH90RG
— Wokal Distance (@wokal_distance) March 2, 2023
2/
Most people think the CDC should focus on health and allow the department of transportation to deal with things like bussing. So, why is the CDC engaging in advocacy for a progressive policy position in a totally different area?How, and more importantly, WHY did this happen?
— Wokal Distance (@wokal_distance) March 2, 2023
3/
This is an important thing to study if we wish to understand how woke activists weaponize institutions and bureaucracies in the name of wokeness (AKA Critical Social Justice).We need to understand this if we are going to fight the weaponizing the bureaucracy effectively.
— Wokal Distance (@wokal_distance) March 2, 2023
As Sun-Tzu noted, if you don’t understand your enemy, at best you’ll have a fifty-fifty shot at defeating them.
In the George Orwell novel “1984”, the protagonist’s job is to identify doubleplusungood news and proclamations and have them rewritten to a more contemporary understanding of the truth while the old versions go away down the “memory hole”.

Rewriting past publications and hiding the fact that they are re-writes, effectively “memory holing”, is going on now, and at the behest of the woke mob and “sensitivity readers”. The stealth “correction” of Roald Dahl’s works caused quite a stir.
“Augustus Gloop is no longer fat, Mrs Twit is no longer fearfully ugly, and the Oompa-Loompas have gone gender-neutral in new editions of Roald Dahl’s beloved stories.
“The publisher, Puffin, has made hundreds of changes to the original text, removing many of Dahl’s colourful descriptions and making his characters less grotesque.
“The review of Dahl’s language was undertaken to ensure that the books ‘can continue to be enjoyed by all today’, Puffin said.
“References to physical appearance have been heavily edited. The word ‘fat’ has been removed from every book – Augustus Gloop in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory may still look like a ball of dough, but can now only be described as ‘enormous’.
“In the same story, the Oompa-Loompas are no longer ‘tiny’, ‘titchy’ or ‘no higher than my knee’ but merely small. And where once they were ‘small men’, they are now ‘small people’.
“Passages not written by Dahl have also been added. In The Witches, a paragraph explaining that witches are bald beneath their wigs ends with the new line: ‘There are plenty of other reasons why women might wear wigs and there is certainly nothing wrong with that.’”
Puffin was caught red handed and promised to undo this. They aren’t sorry for what they did… just that they got caught.
And this is hardly an isolated incident: James Bond will be going politically correct, at least as far as they can get away with it:
News of the Week for March 5th, 2023