The Two Taco Terror

     A teacher berated and physically attacked a child for… trying to eat TWO tacos!

“But when the student returned, [the teacher] Chanel Lemelle allegedly took one of his tacos and told the student ‘he only needed one taco,’ a deputy wrote in the report.

“The witnesses told the deputy that Chanel Lemelle often brought an empty plate to lunch and filled it with food from her students. One of the witnesses also told a deputy that she saw Chanel Lemelle yelling at the same student as he was crying against a wall in a hallway about a week earlier.”

     Considering how little food children get under Kinderführerin Michelle Obama’s lunch initiative, taking away even a little is nearly Dickensian.

May I have another Taco?

Continue reading →

Posted in Education | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Two Taco Terror

News of the Week (February 8th, 2015)

 

News of the Week for Febuary 8th, 2015


Continue reading →

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (February 8th, 2015)

The Ultimate Tool of the Patriarchy? Bacon

     It there any greater symbol of the hate and evil of The Patriarchy™ that… bacon?

     Oppressions is so… tasty.

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Antigender

     Just when you thought you might get a handle on all the invented genders come… antigenders!

     What are these “antigenders“?

     First of all, the opposite of “girl” is “boy”, and the opposite of “boy” is “girl”.  Or are “antiboys” and “antigirls” from a mirror universe?  Does an “anti-boy” combined with a “boy” to produce pure energy on an matter-antimatter annihilation?

Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Antigender

The Ultimate Tool of Oppression: Cheese

     Do you like cheese?  If so then you are literally oppressing both Gaia and everyone in the Third World.

     This is what oppression looks like!

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Ultimate Tool of Oppression: Cheese

Quick Takes – Collapse of Marriage, The Secular Inquisition, and Imperial Precedent

     Quick Takes – Collapse of Marriage, The Secular Inquisition, and Imperial Precedent

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Decline and Fall.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     A professor of sociology has opined how spiffy it is that marriage is dying as a social institution:

“As much as I admire happy couples and families, I think this may be one of the few times in history when so many women could choose from such a full range of life choices without penalty or stigma. Since few people ‘have it all,’ why not choose being single if that’s the best option?”

     This is but the celebration of the destruction of one of the key pillars of society and a prelude to our decline and fall:

“[M]arriage developed in human society in answer to a need which is fundamental to most of our species. Whether you approach it from a biblical perspective or an anthropological one, the vast majority of us have a deep seated need to be with someone. To love someone and be loved in return. And, yes, to create new someones who will grow up with the same needs. It’s a survival mechanism which, in many ways, defines us.

“Further, our ability to advance as a society – from the local level to the global one – seems bound to our built-in tendency to pair up and create families. These families, in turn, bond together to form communities where they share their faith, their fears, their dreams, and their mutual need for protection and security. No taskmaster forced us into these arrangements. We fell into them naturally all over the planet.”

     Social collapse happens over time, and more and more abandon those mores that built up what we have, and adopt more destructive tendencies.

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives, War & Terror | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Quick Takes – Collapse of Marriage, The Secular Inquisition, and Imperial Precedent

Democracy of Now – Tyranny of the Future

     One of the stark contrasts between “Left” and “Right” is the question of tradition.  This is often simplified as “looking in the future” while “living in the now” in contrast with “being stuck in the past”.  Such simplicity makes the brave new world of the future, built upon the scientific reasoning of today, seem so much more attractive than the backwardness of the past.

     Such a choice is a false one, however.  The veritable R. Stacy McCain describes that choice far more aptly:

“We are heirs of a tradition. Each of us is born into circumstances that were created by our parents, by our grandparents, by our ancestors, and by the civilization in which they lived. Human life existed before we were born and will continue after our deaths. As children we inherit the past. As parents we create the future. Wisdom requires us to understand ourselves as a single link in an infinite chain of human existence, rather than to imagine ourselves as free-floating atoms unconnected to others.

“Popular ideas of ‘democracy’ — the modernistic idolatry that speaks the language of ‘rights,’ ‘choice’ and ‘equality’ — obscure the truth of human existence, trapping us in the present tense, isolating us as rootless individuals removed from the authentic traditions of our inheritance. Children are taught that the past is not merely useless, but actually harmful, because human history is nothing but a catalog of oppression, atrocities and victimhood. Thus, the modern child cannot be allowed to believe that his grandparents were wise or virtuous, that the great achievements of our civilization are worthy of respect.”

     The irony, of course, is that those “Progressive” ideas of democracy, rights, choice, and equality were derived from a society that evolved over centuries.  These were not abstract constructs, but the distilled wisdom of millions over centuries, and even mellenia.  They were not the starting point, or even the intent of society (for society has not “intent”).

     The idea that we face a manichean choice between the bad old ways and the glorious Progressive future is a false one.  Society evolves.  The mores, folkways, an customs either serve to bolster and thus perpetuate society, or they serve to destroy them.  The collected wisdom of the ages serves as empirical evidence of what does or does not work.

     Change happens, as it always does, but this is the natural evolution of society.  By applying tried and true principles, we can allow greater freedom of experimenting in new ideas and new ways, while retaining a strong society to fall back upon if new ideas fail by demonstration.

     Perhaps the Kinks said it best:

“Preserving the old ways from being abused
Protecting the new ways for me and for you”

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Flowchart for Choosing Your Gender

     For the vast majority of people, they are either male or female based upon the presence, or lack of, dangly bits.

     For the less than 1% of people (special little snowflakes included), there is this handly little flowchart.

     Click on image for full size.

Gender Flowchart

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Flowchart for Choosing Your Gender

Occupy Syllabus: A Fisking

     How dare a classical social theory class talk about classical social theorists of Western thought be mentioned, at the expense of modern theorists and foreign ideologies?

     A rather pathetic whining about just such a class graced the student pages of the Daily Californian.

     Herein is a frisking of their idiocy.  Admittedly it is mild, but then it disserves but a modicum of mental energy…

“We are calling for an occupation of syllabi in the social sciences and humanities.”

Continue reading →

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Occupy Syllabus: A Fisking

Urban Utopia, Whether You Like It Or Not

     Urban planners remain enamored with a centralized and compact city where the Plebes will be enriched by the culture fed them by the elites (who all have country houses, of course).

     Upon what do they plan their utopias?   Failed Soviet planned cities of course…

“As is sometimes asserted by urbanists today, the new socialist cities were about more than mere economic growth; they were widely posed as a means to develop a new kind of society, one that could make possible the spread of Homo sovieticus (the Soviet man). As one German historian writes, the socialist city was to be a place ‘free of historical burdens, where a new human being was to come into existence, the city and the factory were to be a laboratory of a future society, culture, and way of life’.

“Elements of High Stalinist culture was evident in these cities; the cult of heavy industry, shock worker movement, youth group activity, and the aesthetics of socialist realism. This approach had no room for what in Britain was called “a middle landscape” between countryside and city. Throughout Russia, and much of Eastern Europe, tall apartment blocks were chosen over leafy suburbs. Soviets had no interest in suburbs of any kind because the character of a city ‘is that people live an urban life. And on the edges of the city or outside the city, they live a rural life’. The rural life was exactly what communist leaders hoped their country would get away from, therefore Soviet planners housed residents near industrial sites so they could contribute to their country through state-sponsored work.

“With this assumption, Soviet planners made some logical steps to promote density. They built nurseries and preschools as well as theatre and sports halls within walking distance to worker’s homes.   Communal eating areas were arranged. Also, wide boulevards were crucial for marches and to have a clear path to and from the factory for the workers. The goals of the ‘socialist city’ planners were to not just transform urban planning but human behavior, helping such spaces would breed the ‘urban human’.

“As is common with utopian approaches to cities, problems arose. Rapid development, the speed of construction, the use of night shifts, the long working days, and the inexperience of both workers and management all contributed to frequent technological failures. Contrary to the propaganda, there was a huge gap between the ideal of happy workers thriving in well-managed cities and the reality.”

     Shoving people into cities like sardines in a can has been one of the ideals of the Progressive elite (who again, will have country estates).

     The only solution is to submit to the state and their elitist planners, the Left declares.  They would take all your money to build an alleged utopia that will give you everything that the Soviets delivered via a vis their promise… to the tune of $90 Trillion Dollars.

     Their plans are out there.  Their plans are meant to be implemented.

Continue reading →

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Urban Utopia, Whether You Like It Or Not