Burn A Rainbow Flag, Get Prosecuted

     A transsexual student at the University of British Columbia is being prosecuted for… burning a “Gay rights” rainbow flag.

     The flag was burned as a protest against the Politically Correct modern LGBTQ&c. activists:

“‘It’s passive-aggressive control over the university,’ …[Fink] says.

“‘The university surrendered our flag to the gay power flag.’

“UBC earned the right to fly its own flag, …[Fink] says. It has meaning and history. To replace it with a rainbow flag created in San Francisco — what’s next? …[Fink] asks. An anti-choice flag? An ISIS flag?”

     One must remember that Canada is a land that is full of censorship-crazed bureaucrats and free-speech hating judges.  The perpetrator, Brooklyn Marie Fink, is only being charged with “mischief under $5,000” rather than a hate crime like the University of British Columbia originally wanted, perhaps due to “some… being more equal than others”.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Trans-Women vs. Little Girls

     Which is more important to you, the “right” of a man to “identify” as a woman and use the ladies’ restroom, or the safety of little girls.  For most Progressives, including the ACLU, the obvious answer is to support the “trans-woman”.  For some Progressives who have daughters, that answer isn’t so obvious:

“The African-American woman who leads a state chapter of the ACLU has resigned, citing her own daughters’ ‘frightened’ reaction to biological males using the women’s restroom.

“The organization’s increasing focus on legislating the transgender lobby’s concerns pushed Maya Dillard Smith, interim director of the Georgia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, to tender her resignation.

“‘I have shared my personal experience of having taken my elementary school age daughters into a women’s restroom when shortly after three transgender young adults, over six feet [tall] with deep voices, entered,’ she wrote.

“‘My children were visibly frightened, concerned about their safety and left asking lots of questions for which I, like many parents, was ill-prepared to answer,’ she continued.

“In a statement, she said that the ACLU has become ‘a special interest organization that promotes not all, but certain progressive rights.’

“The ‘hierarchy of rights’ the ACLU chooses to defend or ignore, she wrote, is ‘based on who is funding the organization’s lobbying activities.’ She did not elaborate on the group’s funding.”

     The Progressive Left are obsessed with hierarchies stemming from their concept of “intersectionality” and “Kyriarchy,” whereby the further you are removed from the morally impure White “cis-het” male, the more morally pure your are, and thus more worthy of defending.

     A “trans” person is considered more oppressed than a Black female child, thus organizations like the ACLU will side against Blacks and women, who in this situation are considered to have “power and privilege”, and side with the “oppressed” “trans-woman” who is somehow powerless and disadvantaged despite being able to force society at large to accept the lie that a man is a woman, as an axiomatic truth.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Obama Administration’s Attempts To Reverse Temporally Impose Regulations Ruled Unconstitutional

     Obama, clearly a Master of temporal mechanics and backwards flowing time, was stopped from fining a therapy provider, Caring Hearts, under regulations that were passed after the alleged violation occurred.

“In a little-watched case in the Midwest, the Obama administration’s Medicare regulators were dealt an embarrassing blow this week by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Judges ruled that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) improperly pursued an $800,000 fraud fine against ‘homebound’ therapy provider Caring Hearts, which services Medicare patients, by applying new regulations after-the-fact. The court wrote that CMS was ‘unfamiliar with its own regulations’ and is ‘struggling to keep up with the furious pace of its own rule making'”

     A rational individual might note that ex post facto laws, and regulations stemming therefrom, are a bit on the Unconstitutional side of things.  But clearly the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals is filled with killjoys from Gallifrey…

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives, Science | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Obama Administration’s Attempts To Reverse Temporally Impose Regulations Ruled Unconstitutional

News of the Week (June 5th, 2016)

 

News of the Week for June 5th, 2016


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (June 5th, 2016)

Nevada Primary 2016: First Week Early Voting Roundup And Prognostications

     The first week of early voting in Nevada for the primary election has concluded.  Increasingly, early voting has become the choice of a larger and larger majority of voters in Nevada.  Traditionally, early voting has skewed Republican compared to election day and over all results; absentees have usually been even more Republican.

     Since the Presidential Caucuses are held earlier in the year, it is easier to compare 2016 with 2012: Both years had a Senate primary in a Presidential election year with clear front runners, at least one House seat with a competitive primary in Clark County (home of Las Vegas and a majority of Nevada voters), and no other statewide races on the ballot.

     And so, the comparison.  The number of active registered voters in Nevada in 2016 is 22% higher than it was in 2012, so naturally the number of voters in the primary can be expected to be higher than in 2012.  However, the number of primary voters so far at this point in early voting is only 12% higher than in 2012, with 65,414 early voters in 2016 compared to 47,950 after the first week in 2012.*  This, of course, does not mean much when it comes to either turnout in November, or new registrants between now and November.

     The state can be divided, as Caeser might say, into three parts: Clark County, which contains Las Vegas and 70% of the states population; Washoe County, which contains Reno and 20% of the states population; and the rural counties, which contain 10% of the states population.

     Clark County leans Democratic, while the rural counties are overwhelmingly Republican if not more conservative (hard right 3rd parties can be elected to partisan office in many rural counties).   This leaves Washoe as the “Bellwether” county which has, with two notable exceptions, always gone with the statewide winner in every statewide contest in Nevada this century.

     That being said, the numbers do not bode well for the Republicans.  A comparison of turnout, as a percentage of the vote is noted below for statewide, Clark County, and Washoe County results:

Statewide

  2016 2012
GOP 46.4% 49.7%
Dem 43.9% 43.9%

Clark County

  2016 2012
GOP 40.0% 44.6%
Dem 50.6% 46.7%

Washoe County

  2016 2012
GOP 50.8% 53.9%
Dem 39.0% 36.6%

     As a starting point between 2012 and 2016, this is an ominous sign for Republicans.  Their statewide turnout gap shrunk from over 9 points in 2012 to less than 3 points in 2016.  Even more ominously, their deficit in Clark County shrank from 2 points to 10.  Even in Washoe County shrank from 16 points to 11 points.

     The one big caveat, however, is that primary numbers are not reflective of what will happen in November.  Indeed, there were many races where one candidate in a non-partisan race received a majority of votes in June, but was wiped out in November.**

Continue reading

Posted in Elections | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Franklin the Fair Housing Fox

     Guess what your tax dollars go to fund?

     Franklin the Fair Housing Fox, a mascot for the government’s Fair Housing Act!

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Lady Gaga Praises Her Dear Leader

     The Kims of North Korea, especially Kim Jong-Il, reveled in such titles as “Father of the People,” “Beloved Father,” and “Dear Father”.

     Now it seems like self-absorbed spectacle Lady Gaga (or is it Lady Googoo), wants to praise America’s own “dear leader”, Hillary Clinton:

Continue reading

Posted in Elections, Progressives | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Drinking for Two

     Would you serve a pregnant woman alcohol?  If you are a New York City bartended, you’d better make it a double because the woman is drinking for two:

“A pregnant woman shows up at a New York City bar and wants to go in and order a drink despite health warnings against consuming alcohol while expecting. Should the tavern serve her?

“It’s against the law to refuse, under city Human Rights Commission guidelines released Friday. They center on expansive protections for pregnant workers but also say mothers-to-be can’t be kept out of bars or denied alcoholic drinks just because they’re expecting.

“‘Judgments and stereotypes about how pregnant individuals should behave, their physical capabilities and what is or is not healthy for a fetus are pervasive in our society and cannot be used as pretext for unlawful discriminatory decisions’ in public venues, the new guidelines say.”

     This seems an area that both Progressives and libertines (not real libertarians) endorse: Forcing businesses and workers to surrender any moral agency, and to cater to their every whim.

     What ever happened to the “right to refuse service”?  This isn’t racial or even gender discrimination. Unlike with cakes, flowers, &c. for Gay couples, there is literally an innocent life involved.

Make it a double, I'm drinking for two! *hic*

     This isn’t even about denying a pregnant woman a “right” to drink while pregnant.  This is about forcing a bartender contribute to fetal alcohol syndrome.  Arguments about how the bartended was hired to do a job and must do it, and that if the bartender really doesn’t want to serve booze to a pregnant woman, they are free to quit.  This is a Hobson’s Choice.

     A bartender—anyone—should not be forced to surrender their own moral agency and just follow orders to harm another innocent human being and a prerequisite to holding a job.

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

High Schools Reward Students for Campaigning for Democrats

     From the Oregon House Speaker (and Secretary of State Candidate) to Oregon’s Superintendent of Schools, Democrats in Oregon are misusing a community voting program to reward high school students with school community credit for helping “get out the vote” to elect Democrats to office!

     Democrats misusing government power to for their own electoral ends?

     Whodathunkit!

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Elections, Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on High Schools Reward Students for Campaigning for Democrats

Being Denied Service For Affirming Reality

     In New York City you can be denied service in any establishment for insisting that a man is a man, or otherwise denying the invented personal reality of “trans”-persons by not using their preferred personal pronouns.*

     As Eugene Volokh notes:

“So people can basically force us — on pain of massive legal liability — to say what they want us to say, whether or not we want to endorse the political message associated with that term, and whether or not we think it’s a lie.

“We have to use ‘ze,’ a made-up word that carries an obvious political connotation (endorsement of the ‘non-binary’ view of gender). We have to call people ‘him’ and ‘her’ even if we believe that people’s genders are determined by their biological sex and not by their self-perceptions — perceptions that, by the way, can rapidly change, for those who are “gender-fluid” — and that using terms tied to self-perception is basically a lie.”

     Reality is not subjective.  Reality is not a “social construct”.  It is one thing to believe oneself is a man or a woman or any other invented gender, but it is quite another to use the power of the government to force not only businesses, but other patrons to bend their speech to one’s will.  Remind me again just who has power and privilege?

     Volokh just complains that this strikes right at the heart of free speech:

“And this isn’t just the government as employer, requiring its employees to say things that keep government patrons happy with government services. This is the government as sovereign, threatening ‘civil penalties up to $125,000 for violations, and up to $250,000 for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct’ if people don’t speak the way the government tells them to speak.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Science | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments