The Challenge Of Marxism

     The beliefs of the far Left are becoming less mere academic flippancy and more concrete proposals to fundamentally transform America to the point of annihilation. If you want to defeat this assault on freedom under the law, then it is important to understand the philosophical underpinnings, and groan-worthy as they may be, and to not only treat it as the real threat it is, but also be able to undermine their undermining.

     The core tenets of Marxism, both its fantasy as well as its presumptions and dishonest cribbing of others, are necessary to understand if we are to counter its already systemic influence and power. An article at Quillete by Yoram Hazony might start as a brief primer.

“We can describe Marx’s political framework as follows:

“1. Oppressor and oppressed

Marx argues that, as an empirical matter, people invariably form themselves into cohesive groups (he calls them classes), which exploit one another to the extent they are able. A liberal political order is no different in this from any other, and it tends toward two classes, one of which owns and controls pretty much everything (the oppressor); while the other is exploited, and the fruit of its labor appropriated, so that it does not advance and, in fact, remains forever enslaved (the oppressed). In addition, Marx sees the state itself, its laws and its mechanisms of enforcement, as a tool that the oppressor class uses to keep the regime of oppression in place and to assist in carrying out this work.

“2. False consciousness

Marx recognizes that the liberal businessmen, politicians, lawyers, and intellectuals who keep this system in place are unaware that they are the oppressors, and that what they think of as progress has only established new conditions of oppression. Indeed, even the working class may not know that they are exploited and oppressed. This is because they all think in terms of liberal categories (e.g., the individual’s right to freely sell his labor) which obscure the systematic oppression that is taking place. This ignorance of the fact that one is an oppressor or oppressed is called the ruling ideology (Engels later coined the phrase false consciousness to describe it), and it is only overcome when one is awakened to what is happening and learns to recognize reality using true categories.

“3. Revolutionary reconstitution of society

Marx suggests that, historically, oppressed classes have materially improved their conditions only through a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large—that is, through the destruction of the oppressor class, and of the social norms and ideas that hold the regime of systematic oppression in place. He even specifies that liberals will supply the oppressed with the tools needed to overthrow them. There is a period of “more or less veiled civil war, raging within existing society, up to the point where that war breaks out into open revolution” and the “violent overthrow” of the liberal oppressors. At this point, the oppressed seize control of the state.

“4. Total disappearance of class antagonisms

Marx promises that after the oppressed underclass takes control of the state, the exploitation of individuals by other individuals will be “put to an end” and the antagonism between classes of individuals will totally disappear. How this is to be done is not specified.”

     Mr. Hazony also discusses this topic via podcast.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Challenge Of Marxism

Decline & Fall of British Humor

     Post-WWII, one of the things that the British could boast about was their brilliant comedy, that even the BBC could boast about while otherwise putting down the U.K.

     So, what has British “humor”—in all it’s political correctness—degraded to?

     This.

     As the veritable Daniel Hannan notes, “Does anyone, even the wokiest of the woke, actually find this funny? My suspicion is that it triggers a kind of Pavlovian response: ‘Ooh, she said something about racists, I’d better guffaw’.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

United States To Global Internationalists: Go Pound Sand (Or Worse)

     With all the chaos and downsides of “living in interesting times”, from Impeachment and Corona-chan to the George Floyd riots cum revolutionary temper-tantrums, one rather important element of international conflict, abet a non-shooting one (so far), is the clash between the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United States of America.

     The Trump administration has authorized sanctions against the International Criminal Court.

“President Donald Trump on Thursday moved to further punish officials of the International Criminal Court, authorizing economic sanctions against them as well as the expansion of visa restrictions on the officials and their families.

“The president also declared a national emergency with respect to the “threat” he says the ICC poses, a move that lays legal groundwork to impose future sanctions.

“The efforts come amid Trump administration anger over the ICC’s efforts to look into alleged war crimes by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.”

     Why?

“The ICC ‘is little more than a political tool employed by unaccountable international elites,’ [Attorney General Bill] Barr said at the news conference, where officials took no questions. He claimed the Justice Department had ‘received substantial credible information that raises serious concerns about a long history of financial corruption and malfeasance at the highest levels’ of the court, which the department is now investigating, he said.”

     The United States is not subservient to the International Criminal Court and never ratified any treaty to that effect. The ICC has no power over the United States and the United States does not recognize the authority or legitimacy of the ICC. To put it bluntly, the International Criminal Court are akin to gangsters or pirates when it comes to American citizens. This is why the President of the United States is authorized to legally liberate any American from the clutches of the ICC (the law that authorizes that is also known as the “Hague Invasion Act”).

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Philosophy of Wokeness

     The beliefs of the far Left are becoming less mere academic flippancy and more concrete proposals to fundamentally transform America to the point of annihilation. If you want to defeat this assault on freedom under the law, then it is important to understand the philosophical underpinnings, and groan-worthy as they may be, and to not only treat it as the real threat it is, but also be able to undermine their undermining.

     A discussion of this “philosophy of wokeness” was undertaken on the Federalist Radio Hour with Emily Jashinsky and Spencer Klavan.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Philosophy of Wokeness

Sandia Struggle Sessions Revisited

     If you thought the previous revelations about mandatory wokeness and racial/sex discrimination at Sandia National Laboratory, where critical nuclear weapons systems work is undertaken, were bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

<sarcasm>
     Because endangering work with NUCLEAR F**KIN’ WEAPONS is sooo worth it in order to achieve racial misandry animus with an oppressive intersectional hierarchy!
</sarcasm>

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Science, War & Terror | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

News of the Week (August 23rd, 2020)

 

News of the Week for Aug. 23rd, 2020


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | 1 Comment

Equity & Marxism Explained In Cartoon Form

     A core belief of the many of the Orwellianly named “anti-fascist” and “anti-racist” rioters/revolutionaries is that “equality”—not just of opportunity, but also results —is evil because it does not compensate for the “unearned privilege” that White individuals purportedly have, and thus some people need to be discriminated against and others put in a privileged position to the point where an equal and opposite inequality of results “balances out” the “unearned privilege” (which presumable weighs the same as a duck), which apparently also requires abolishing Capitalism.

     This is often, sportingly, illustrated with the following cartoon.

     However, some more truthful versions of this cartoon have been made.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Fighting Racism In Academia With Witchcraft

     Self-declared witches are well known by now for their wokeness and their hexing of enemies including Brett Kavanaugh, the Confederacy, Gentrification, and toilets used by “cis kids”. Unsurprisingly, witchcraft in college is not unknown, and now self-declared witches are invoking Satan and hexing the leader of the Young Conservatives of Texas (YCT).

“A former UNT student posted a picture of items for a ‘hex’ with ‘intentions of misfortune’ against YCT leader Kelly Neidert. Anna Katz, a recent graduate of UNT, tweeted a picture of a drawing of a goat captioned ‘the devil’ and a cauldron. Katz, who later removed the Tweet, could not be reached for comment.

“Neidert said she is familiar with attempts to ‘cancel’ her group and that the emergence of would-be witches looking to ‘hex’ her is alarming. While Katz said she wished only ‘misfortune, not physical harm,’ Neidert said the message disturbed her.

“‘I think that is a demonstration of pure evil,’ Neidert told the Washington Free Beacon. ‘It’s not cute, it shouldn’t be a trend, that’s actually evil. Considering the card said “the devil” on it … we shouldn’t be interacting with anything that has something to do with him.’”

     Magical thinking is a hallmark of Leftist thought; this self-declared “witch” is just being honest about that.

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Fighting Racism In Academia With Witchcraft

Restorative Justice

     Unlike the adversarial legal process used in American criminal law, and the Common Law more broadly, or the process of civil litigation, the concept of “restorative justice” superficially sounds more fair and conducive towards reconciliation.   However, the reality is far, far different. While no process is perfect, the restorative model is worse.

     The adversarial process has as a major precept the idea that a person is presumed to not be guilty and the state, which seeks to take away a persons freedom (either as punishment or rehabilitation), must prove beyond reasonable doubt that a person is guilty of a specific crime and that the actions of the state are necessary.   With civil litigation, there is a presumption of neutrality, where the court/jury weighs in with a preponderance of the evidence to determine liability.

     Restorative justice, as described by þe olde Wikipedia is “is an approach to justice in which one of the responses to a crime is to organize a meeting between the victim and the offender, sometimes with representatives of the wider community. The goal is for them to share their experience of what happened, to discuss who was harmed by the crime and how, and to create a consensus for what the offender can do to repair the harm from the offense.

     Unlike the adversarial or even civil litigation routes, there is no protection from a presumption of guilt. Perhaps in such a system a honest and open investigation will take place, but such a thing happening is completely dependent on the good nature and will of the organizers who run this restorative justice session. The adversarial and civil litigation models, on the other hand, provide protections for the accused, which even if imperfect is still more than nothing.

     But worse still, is the inclusion of the “representatives of the wider community”. This input is meant to create “justice” that is conducive to the community as a whole and subsumes any protection of the accused beneath the “shareholders’” interests in moulding society and enacting the broader ideological goal of the self-declared community leaders. In effect, this means that one’s guilt or innocence becomes irrelevant to the “justice” of the collective whole beyond it’s utility in furthering that ideological vision of “justice”. Notice, as well, the intent to “create consensus”. “Consensus” is the purported “non-hierarchical” means by which the “will of the people” is enacted without anyone having any power over anyone else; a fiction that hides the fact that they who lead the mob actually exercise power over others, by hook or crook, and woe be to those who do not fall in line with the proffered “consensus”.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Restorative Justice

Yes, It CAN Happen “Here”

     Many people who don’t live in places like Minneapolis, Portland, or Seattle tend to believe that “it can’t happen here” and that most people are immune to that insanity. In large part this is an effect of how the Left prepares sub rosa before a public fait accompli.   It is also an effect of a parochial view that presumes the persistence of what turns out to be an ephemeral and superficial normalcy.

     Such is that case of Texas, where, much like Minneapolis, Portland, or Seattle, one of Texas’ major cities (and it’s capitol) has unanimously voted to “defund the police”.

“Austin City Council voted unanimously to defund the Austin Police Department on Thursday. The vote was in favor of taking one-third of the police department’s funding away and moving that money to something called the Decouple and Reimagine Safety funds. How very Austin-sounding this move is. Sadly, this doesn’t come as a surprise.

“When most people think of Texas, especially in political terms, they think of the country’s largest red state. That is mostly true as far as statewide offices go. But for local city and county elections, Texas is a purple-leaning state. The biggest cities and counties are now all run by Democrats. Harris County (Houston) was the latest to fall into Democrat control and that happened in 2018.

“Austin, Texas is a very liberal university city. It is the home of the University of Texas – Austin as well as the state capitol. The city’s motto is ‘Keep Austin Wierd’, so that gives you an idea of the attitude in Austin. Anything goes. Too bad the motto isn’t ‘Keep Austin Safe’, right? After hearing public comments on Wednesday – more than 200 people signed up to speak – the city council voted on the city budget on Thursday. That vote cuts $150M from police funding out of the city’s $4.2 billion budget. About $20 million will be immediately removed from the department’s funding.”

     So YES, it can “happen here”. The only real difference is that in places like Minneapolis, Portland, or Seattle, the cancer of wokeness is far more advanced. Can it still be stopped “here”? Maybe, but doing so will require a recognition of the danger, and a dedication to understanding the threat, identifying the cancer, and targeting it wisely.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment