Anti-Racism Infects The American Medical Association

     The number of professional organizations that are going full woke seem to be increasing exponentially as off late. Perhaps one of the most frightening examples is an organization that represents the professionals in whose hands we place our very lives and the lives of our loved ones, namely doctors: The American Medical Association (AMA).

“Building on its June pledge to confront systemic racism and police brutality, the AMA has taken action to explicitly recognize racism as a public health threat and detailed a plan to mitigate its effects.

“‘The AMA recognizes that racism negatively impacts and exacerbates health inequities among historically marginalized communities. Without systemic and structural-level change, health inequities will continue to exist, and the overall health of the nation will suffer,’ said AMA Board Member Willarda V. Edwards, MD, MBA.

“‘As physicians and leaders in medicine, we are committed to optimal health for all, and are working to ensure all people and communities reach their full health potential,’ Dr. Edwards said. “DDeclaring racism as an urgent public health threat is a step in the right direction toward advancing equity in medicine and public health, while creating pathways for truth, healing, and reconciliation.’”

     Their specific police points include:

  • Acknowledge that, although the primary drivers of racial health inequity are systemic and structural racism, racism and unconscious bias within medical research and health care delivery have caused and continue to cause harm to marginalized communities and society as a whole.
  • Recognize racism, in its systemic, cultural, interpersonal and other forms, as a serious threat to public health, to the advancement of health equity and a barrier to appropriate medical care.
  • Support the development of policy to combat racism and its effects.
  • Encourage governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations to increase funding for research into the epidemiology of risks and damages related to racism and how to prevent or repair them.
  • Encourage the development, implementation and evaluation of undergraduate, graduate and continuing medical education programs and curricula that engender greater understanding of the causes, influences, and effects of systemic, cultural, institutional and interpersonal racism, as well as how to prevent and ameliorate the health effects of racism.

     Do racial slurs cause cancer? Does lack of Affirmative Action cause diabetes?

     Note how they are using the term “inequity and equity”, and not equality. As we should all know by now, racial equity requires racial discrimination.

     It is deeply ironic for these professional associations to basically declare their profession, and its practitioners, to be fundamentally racist (aside from the enlightened woke ones, of course), and then turn around and say that their racist professions and racist practitioners ought to be the ones to lecture us!

But how to do they purport to “cure” racism? Is there a surgery to remove racists parts of the brain or a vaccine we can inject into babies to prevent them from becoming racist?

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Critical Election Theory

     Ever notice how “Critical Theory” isn’t selectively applied and wondered how it would go if applied to some non-woke preconceived conclusion?

     Thanks to Twitter user James Lindsay, you can!

“People who deny any evidence of election fraud exhibit a rhetorical strategy known as ‘election fragility,’ which is deployed when one knows there is evidence of massive election fraud and a lack of political stamina and political humility necessary to cope with that fact.

“People denying election fraud often benefit from the election having been stolen. This makes them complicit in the fraud. Their fraud complicity is a feature of their political privilege. They deny fraud because they can’t have their political comfort disrupted.

“Election fraud is systemic. It is the ordinary state of affairs, not an aberration, in elections. The question is not ‘did election fraud take place?’ but ‘how did fraud manifest in this election?’ Anything that maintains the ruling class’s political comfort is suspect.

Continue reading

Posted in Elections, Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 4)

     Because nothing helps you forget a year of Corona-chan like a medieval version of “It’s Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas” which harkens back to those halycon days of the Black Death.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on 12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 4)

Happy Bill of Rights Day!

     Today is the 229th anniversary of the first ten amendments to the Constitution coming into effect. The original Bill of Rights contained a preamble stating that the clauses were “declaratory and restrictive” — i.e. they restricted the Federal Government and simply declared already existing rights and liberties. This is in stark contrast with almost every non-American declaration of rights, wherein inherent rights are conflated with promised of government handouts and benefits.

     The Bill of Rights, as passed by Congress, has twelve articles, the 3rd through 12th became what we know today as the first tend amendments to the Constitution and what people generally refer to when they speak of the Bill of Rights. The first article that was proposed was never ratified; the second article was ratified over 200 years later and became the 27th Amendment.

     Below is the Bill of Rights, including preamble, as passed by Congress:

.

CongressOF THE United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.:

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

 

Article the first

 

After the first enumeration required by the first Article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons.

 

Article the second

 

No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.

 

Article the third

 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

Article the fourth

 

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

Article the fifth

 

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

 

Article the sixth

 

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

Article the seventh

 

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

Article the eighth

 

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

 

Article the ninth

 

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

 

Article the tenth

 

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 

Article the eleventh

 

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

 

Article the twelfth

 

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

ATTEST: Frederick Augustus
Muhlenberg, Speaker of the House of Representatives

     ALL of the Bill of Rights for ALL of the People

Posted in Gun Rights, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 3)

     A very “Year 2020” Season’s Greetings…

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 3)

The British NHS Is A Cult

     A curious thing to Americans that there is nary a dissenting voice about the British National Health Service, even from the most conservative corners, despite the NHS’s rather horrific record. The only explanation is that the NHS is a cult with devotional followers, which the following NHS homily repleate with being declared “our saviour” and “each one one of you we bless”. It even comes complete with festive holiday music despite being released in April, shows.

     If there was any other doubt that the NHS is a cult, they even perform child sacrifices!

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Vulva Owners And The De-gendering Of Biology

      The woke madness of transgender ideology demands that we “de-gender” body parts unique to each sex in order to further the flights of fancy that one can be a “man” or a “woman” not only as it regardless of one’s biological sex but as it regards the existence of biological sex at all to the point of denigrating it to simply body parts that one may or may not have regardless of whether they are a “man” or a “woman”.

      But some scientifically accurate terms such as “vagina” and “penis” are so associated with the female and male sexes, respectively, that not even using those terms to describe people can be allowed, and even greater euphemisms of inanity are invented such as “birthing people” or “menstruators”. But now we have a new eupemism which is quickly becoming widespread: “Vulva Owners”.

      The article in question from “healthline” even uses the radical feminist term “penis in vagina” (e.g. “PIV”) to describe normal sexual intercourse, amongst other insanities from that website.

      But that’s just one website, right?

      Nope.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Science | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Vulva Owners And The De-gendering Of Biology

12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 2)

     Inugami Korone, the happy Christmas VTuber doggo!

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on 12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 2)

News of the Week (December 13th, 2020)

 

News of the Week for Dec. 13th, 2020


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (December 13th, 2020)

12 Posts of Christmas, 2020 (Day 1)

     ‘Tis that time of year again…

     Hashire sori yo, Kaze no you ni, Tsukimihara wo, PADORU PADORU!

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 10 Comments