Commissarial Dictatorship Of Fallen Angels

     A “utopian” ideology is any ideology that is predicated on good people beyond temptation creating and/or maintaining a good and wonderful society, even when those “good people” do so on an oracular basis, or via the will of the people (who are either a god collectively themselves or the lens of a god’s light).

     Sadly, this is an attitude that has been taken up by many on the post-conservative “Right”, as as James Lindsay notes, which is quoted in full below due to the limitations of Twitter/X embeds.

This is what Carl Schmitt (a favorite philosopher on the Woke Right) calls a “commissarial dictatorship,” which is supposed to assume dictatorial decision powers to return the republic to its constitutional normative order.

The problem with Schmitt’s conception is obvious, though. If the executive can declare a special state outside of the constitutional order and bis unbound by it, even just to restore the order, he can declare the demand to restore the order an emergency of its own right, violating his executive sovereignty. Such a dictator, Schmitt calls a “sovereign dictator.”

That means the only barrier between a tyrant and an unbound executive who restores the republic from a state of exception is the conscience of the executive at the precise moment when his temptation to power is highest. It’s not impossible, but it’s exceptionally rare, and it will not last through many such temptations, especially in the hands of another executive with less character.

This road is folly. “The evil Left set the rules, so we have to play by them” is a Satanic temptation we must resist.

Pray for these people, for they are lost.

They’re not our leaders, though. They’ve abdicated the trust necessary to allow that.

      Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Corporatism à la Vance

     of the greatest differences of America (and the Anglosphere more broadly) and the rest of the world was the concept that there was a separation of people and state.   Going back over 800 years ago, even before the Magna Carta, was the Charter of the Forest which distinguished between the right of the people, on an individual basis, to use the forests and the right of the state, in the body of the King, to control it as the state, in the body of the King, willed and dictated. This was one of the first examples of our modern heritage stemming back from over throwing the “Norman Yoke” of Continental Europe, and certainly the earliest overt signs thereof. This heritage and birthright of all those who hold such precious things in common has helped protect America from more European notions that arose within the past couple of centuries or so, and thus helped, even if imperfectly, to inoculate us from these foreign ideas from foreign peoples in foreign countries without a “shared” history.

     But that hasn’t stopped some populist elites from declaring that the public is private and the private public. Case in point: J.D. Vance:

     And no, the “full clip” does not give context that magically changes the plain words of J.D Vance. He was not being descriptive of a bad thing, but instead embracing those means as a tool for his own ends.

     This is, fundamentally, an Unamerican view echoed, ironically enough, not just by a foreigner with foreign ideas from a foreign land without shared history, but from a leader who speaks a foreign language so foreign as to make Iranian and Hindi literally and linguistically related in a way his language isn’t.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Ultimate Conspiracy Of Power & Oppression

     Cultural Marxism is, at its root, a grand conspiracy as to why Marixsm didn’t spontaniously become adopted by industrial nations. From that is mutated into a viral infection that makes the infected consider themselves the vaunted oppressed kept down by systems of oppression. Any superficial form can be grafted onto this and any oppressor/oppressed dynamic works, even if it conflicts with another such virally adopted dynamic of oppressor/oppressed. As “Liberty Belleexplains, which is quoted in full below due to the limitations of Twitter/X embeds:

Critical Theory is ultimately a conspiracy theory about power & systemic oppression. It justifies its believers’ ressentiment (suppressed rage & envy) & allows them to project their own failures onto others.

Revisiting Critical Theory, & keeping this in mind when looking at Woke & Wokish:

Critical Theory is a critical theory of society. It believes that power is at the bottom of everything, & not just power but corrupted power. An evil, oppressive force.

Critical Theory arose from cultural Marxism, & figures from the Frankfurt School. It ran with the idea that the revolutionary movement needed to be shifted from economics to culture. The targets became the institutions of cultural production.

The Critical Theorists’ tactic: relentless criticism of everything you want to control.

Critical Theory aims to raise critical consciousness; to become “awakened” to man’s position as imprisoned within oppressive social systems, & to know the hidden truths behind the force that is oppressing him. This is “Woke.”

Critical Theory informs their critiques, & their prescriptions to solve society’s ills.

They identify social problems, criticize them, elicit critical consciousness by communicating these critiques in an attempt to gather support in their endeavor to spur a revolution. The critical theorist seeks liberation from oppressive social structures that perpetuate inequalities & injustices.

Their goal is disruption, subversion, & revolution for an ultimate goal of replacing existing hegemony with their system. They believe that their “awakened elite”, those with the hidden truths, should replace the corrupted elite.

This is the Critical Theory dynamic:

Critique —> liberate —> transform

For the Critical Theorist, is the oppressor capitalists, Westerners, men, white people— or is it “The Jews,” liberals & liberalism, racial & ethnic minorities, women, or the “Post-war consensus”??

No matter what the “oppressive force” is that’s identified, Critical Theory is in opposition to a classically liberal society that prizes & protects individual liberties.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (September 7th, 2025)

 

News of the Week for September 7th, 2025


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Leave a comment

Firing Line Friday: Should We Drastically Reduce Immigration? Part II

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     One of the hottest political topics today is the question of immigration. Let us look back thirty years as the question of whether we should drastically reduce immigration, of the legal variety, is debated by William F. Buckley, Jr., Leon Botstein, Peter Brimelow, Ira Glasser, Daniel A. Stein, Ariana Huffington, Frank Sharry, and Ed Koch in Part Two of this exchange.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Quick Takes – Lawfare via Nature: United Nations; National Geogrpahic; Climate Homicide

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: It’s mutually assured destruction time thanks to the advocates of Mother Earth…

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     How dare you say that your rights are greater than some patch of dirt!

“How radical has the U.N. become? This radical. Volker Türk, the United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights, stated in a recent speech at Oxford University that nature rights are equivalent to human rights.

“…

“ Granting rights to nature would destroy all that he claims to want to accomplish for suffering humanity. Freedom requires prosperity. Instituting sterling environmental practices depends on economic thriving. Eradicating destitution in the world will necessitate responsible but vigorous exploitation of natural resources — the very practices that nature rights radicals seek to impede.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

America Is An Idea

     America is indeed an idea. But it is not a proscriptive—or propositional—idea. It is a descriptive one. Classical Liberalism was but an attempt to distill its core elements; conservatism was an attempt to distill, and protect, the causal factors that led to such a unique and, ‘twould seem these days, fragile miracle. It has become more than any blut und boden mentality could possible fathom.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Cracker Barrel Crack-Up

     Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. Everything seemed better in the past and businesses that catered to nostalgia have gained, in some minds, mythical status (and sub-mythical sales) while others are condemned for not having the logo or motif from their childhood. In the case of many restaurants, particularly fast food restaurants, the reason is simple: Fewer and fewer people are dining in and even fewer are going for some ambience; people are increasingly just picking up the food via drive through or just ordering in via an “app” like Door Dash or Uber Eats. When that happens, companies optimize their logo to be readily discernable on a small phone app rather than in some large sign that in many places is impracticable, or even illegal.   Such was the case with the chain restaurant Cracker Barrel, but this time with culture war cringe.

     The replacement of the older, more complex sign and logo with a simpler one caused an online apoplectic fit, with one politician even comparing this with an attack on Christianity due to his finding Jesus in their parking lot (allegedly). Some even went to far as to call it “woke”.

     Woke? As much as one might dispise the design, there was nothing particularly “woke” aobut it. It didn’t even devolve into the “globohomo” corporate design we are seeing more of.   What we ‘ve seen is nothing short of exploitation of nostalgia for political point scoring. Why would a politician or political entity complain, aside from virtue signaling. What is the government supposed to do? Regulate logos so they conform to some thin veneer of cultural aesthetics?

     It’s not like this is going to fix a real problem like the debt or anything.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (August 31st, 2025)

 

News of the Week for August 31st, 2025


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Leave a comment

Firing Line Friday: Should We Drastically Reduce Immigration? Part I

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     One of the hottest political topics today is the question of immigration. Let us look back thirty years as the question of whether we should drastically reduce immigration, of the legal variety, is debated by William F. Buckley, Jr., Leon Botstein, Peter Brimelow, Ira Glasser, Daniel A. Stein, Ariana Huffington, Frank Sharry, and Ed Koch in Part One of this exchange.

     Until next Friday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment