Free speech goes along way, far more in America than elsewhere. But a call to violence and killing by willing acolytes in an act of Treason ain’t exactly a paragon of 1st Amendment protection. Yet “Calypso Louie” Farrakahn did just that:
A little mood music:
The Advanced Placement United States History exam came under fire for major revision which incorporated Progressive bias as fact. The outcry was surprisingly loud enough to cause a re-write of the revision to allegedly make it more accurate and neutral in view.
It turns out, however, that the test is anything but a lesson in American Exceptionalism:
“While the College Board has thrown in a mention of American exceptionalism to placate critics, the framework itself continues to focus on globalism, culture-mixing, gender identity, migration, environmentalism, and such. America’s sense of principled mission, its unique blending of religious and democratic commitment, its characteristic emphasis on local government, the high cultural esteem in which economic enterprise is held, and America’s distinctive respect for individual liberty, are neither stressed nor contrasted with other countries to highlight the American difference.
News of the Week for August 9th, 2015
Because describing your sexuality with unicorns and dragons is just too normal, you can now describe it with… lizards and other reptiles and amphibians…
Since chromosomes have become irrelevant when it comes to gender, marriage, and even biological sex itself, how could anything but irrational animus explain why trans-species weddings aren’t allowed?
After all, personhood and consent are simply legal constucts. Heck, as with Gay penguins, cross-species sexuality is found in nature!
Hillary Clinton is promising to “reset” capitalism, and under the guidance of the state be put into “balance“:
“Capitalism itself,… [Hillary Clinton] said, “needs to be reinvented, it needs to be put back into balance.’
“Her speech, delivered at New York University’s Stern School of Business, was the sort of numerate wonk-fest that’s come to characterize her early campaign — an effort aimed in part at comparing favorably with the sprawling free-for-all on the Republican side. It also helped advance the argument she aims to make the substantive centerpiece of both her bid and her presidency: Addressing economic inequality is the defining challenge of our time.
“…
“Clinton called for regulators to finalize the Dodd-Frank requirement that companies list the ratio of executive to worker pay.”
Hillary! has taken a distinctly totalitarian tone: “Campaign advisers say Mrs. Clinton’s goal is chiefly to change investor behavior”
While some may fear a communist style authoritarianism, her plan is more of a third way:
“It is not reactionary but revolutionary, for it anticipates the solution of certain universal problems which have been raised elsewhere, in the political field by the splitting up of parties, the usurpation of power by parliaments, the irresponsibility of assemblies; in the economic field by the increasingly numerous and important functions discharged by trade unions and trade associations with their disputes and ententes, affecting both capital and labor; in the ethical field by the need felt for order, discipline, obedience to the moral dictates of patriotism.…
“[She] desires the State to be strong and organic, based on broad foundations of popular support. The… State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporative, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organized in their respective associations, circulate within the State.”
The Left praised it openly before, and are doing so again.
Blithering idjit Chris Hayes seems incapable of understanding a simple sentence in English, to whit: The 2nd Amendment:
The Supreme Court in Heller basically deleted the "well regulated militia" portion of the 2nd Amendment. #textualism #inners
— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) July 25, 2015
Aside from the rather straight-forward explanation in the Heller decision (which was correct because it was correct, not because of the balance of nine black-robed juctices), the fact that the 2nd Amendment was right held by individuals has been well established by the courts. Moreover, it has been established by the English language.
The norm throughout history has been that different peoples are different, and that one people would either replace another peoples culture, or even replace them outright genetically. That is the default, and a default which is still the norm in this day and age throughout most of the world. The great exception to this is the exceptionalism the embodies America.
Ours is a civic heritage that transcends ethnicity and is not restricted by geographic extent. And because that is so ingrained into the very essence of America, that there is a revulsion against the global and historical default to define a people by blood or land.
And so, the not-so-great hullabaloo of the “cuckservative” flap reared its head. The vast majority of conservatives, including the veritable Ace of Spades, the veritable Stacy McCain, Erick Erickson, the folks over at HotAir, and especially SooperMexican (who was subject to racist insults), have outted the White supremacists who are pushing the term — though the term has had its defenders.
This tribalism, which is the default found almost everywhere and else throughout history, is rejected. But this ancient tribalism is not the pseudo-scientific racism propagated by the eugenic loving Progressive ideology of un-American elitists.
The Progressive Left have, from the inception of Progressivism as a bastard cousin of other far Left examples of insanity, pushed pseudo-science as an absolute truth to be followed, with pseudo-scientific texts acting as catechisms of a secular text. From Social Darwinism, to the eugenics of Planned Parenthood’s found Margaret Sanger, treating people as just a part of a collective identity. They reduce a person as just a part of a whole.
Doctors who kill their patients in order to harvest said patients organs are nothing but ghouls. Sadly, in many countries, these ghouls are not only protected by the law, but encouraged in their evil.
Harvesting organs isn’t just for Planned Parenthood and their fetus-o-rama sales pitches. Increasingly, the harvesting of organs from euthanized patients is not only allowed, but encouraged and applauded.
We were told that euthanasia would only be used on patients who were terminal, suffering extreme pain, and were of sufficient mental capacity to consent to their own homicide. That was a lie. It has proven to be a lie. No longer can kill-happy doctors and organ harvesters claim a “slippery-slope fallacy”, as said “slippery-slope” has be demonstrated to be anything but fallacious.
That has repeatedly been shown to be a lie. These so-called “doctors” kill babies and patients with dementia or other mental illnesses. And they are asking for more de jure powers to kill even though they are allowed to slaughter innocents de facto.
News of the Week for August 2nd, 2015
E-mail me!
