News of the Week for October 25th, 2015
News of the Week for October 25th, 2015
Apparently lesbianism is not just something one can be “new” to (so much for “born that way”), but a wide range of archetypes once can choose from!

These are not merely “substitutes for personality” but personality types that are unique to lesibans like “sports,” “art,” and the “outdoors”…
Just further proof that, much like invented genders and sexualities, this is all about validation and “feelz”.
Joe Biden is proud of the “Violence Against Women Act” that he supported in the Senate. He also seems a bit pensive about the “Yes Means Yes” standard…
“Vice President Joe Biden mused at a Domestic Violence Awareness Month roundtable today that new rules about affirmative consent for any sexual activity can be ‘tricky.’
“Biden said ‘that’s my instinct’ when talking about leaning toward both parties in sexual activity giving a ‘yes’ first.
“‘The cultural norms make it still kind of hard to say “yes, I’d like you to kiss me or yes, I’d like you to do that,”‘ he said. ‘So it’s still tricky.'”
Considering just how much Joe Biden likes a little grope now and then, is it any surprise that he shows at least some hesitation on the “Yes Means Yes” question?

Joe Biden エッチする
Believing that one’s body does not reflect who they “really” are is not limited to those with gender dysphasia, but extends to those who feel like they are at heart disabled, despite being perfectly healthy.

One such mentally ill individual decided that she was not going to just feel disabled, she was going to make herself disabled:
“A woman in North Carolina is attracting media attention for telling her story about pouring drain cleaner in her eyes because she identifies as a blind person.
“…
“By the time I was six I remember that thinking about being blind made me feel comfortable,” she said. She fantasized constantly about losing her vision, and spent hours staring directly at the sun after her mother warned her that it would damage her eyes.
“At first, Shuping simply pretended to be blind, going about with sunglasses on, her eyes closed, and using a cane to navigate. She also became fluent in braille. But after a while, that just wasn’t enough.”
What is most frightening is that this woman’s psychologist helped to make this woman blind!
“Determined to turn her dream into a reality, Ms Shuping found a psychologist willing to help her become blind and took the necessary steps in 2006.
“They first put in numbing eyedrops – which Ms Shuping picked up during a special visit to Canada – followed by a couple of drops of drain cleaner in each eye.”
The cries for gender “equality” tend to be hypocritical: Feminists whine about more men in engineering, while defending the female dominated non-science college majors. But real equality, in the most extreme understanding, means than men and women have not only the same opportunities, but the exact same duties. This of course includes being willing to fight and die in the armed forces.
“Women will eventually have to register for the draft if ‘true and pure equality’ is to be realized in the U.S. military, Army Secretary John McHugh said Monday.
“‘If your objective is true and pure equality then you have to look at all aspects’ of the roles of women in the military, McHugh said, and registration for the draft ‘will be one of those things. That will have to be considered.’
“McHugh said draft registration was not a subject to be decided by the services or the Department of Defense, and will ultimately have to be dealt with by Congress. He expected a “pretty emotional debate and discussion.”
“However, as more military occupational specialties are opened to women, the debate on Selective Service System registration was inevitable, McHugh said. ‘If we find ourselves as a military writ large where men and women have equal opportunity, as I believe we should,’ he said.”
Women have always been protected in some way or another in civilized societies from the horror of war, they concomitantly have not had the duty to sacrifice their lives. While they had to send sons and husbands to war, they have not had to send themselves or their daughters to war.

Women, of course, are quite capable of serving in the armed forces and contributing in a myriad number of ways. Many women are capable of martial valor. But women are not interchangeable with men and we should not expect them to be. But if one insists that women are equivalent to men as an absolute truth, than there is no legitimate reason to not draft women and have them serve in the same life-threatening situations as men.
If the Feminists don’t like that, then they can shut up and “get back to the front”:
California Lt. Gov. (and former San Fransisco mayor) Gavin Newsom has decided that Gov. Moonbeam isn’t anti-civil liberty when it comes to the 2nd Amendment, and is pushing oppressive measures that will thrill the elite (who are protected by armed guards).
Amongst the provisions he’d push:
Outlaw magazines that hold more than ten rounds. It has been illegal for decades now to buy a magazine that holds more than ten rounds, but existing magazines were grandfathered in. Now, Newsom wants to help criminals by hindering honest citizens…
The initiative would also require background check for… ammo.
Calls for the replacement of a population with one more amenable one is at this point a sad and pathetic, if true, trope of the Left. “Tommy Commie” Hayden called for the kindler, gentler genocide of White people, and Nevada state Sen. “Tick” Segerblom has expressed similar enthusiasm for the elimination of White people.

But it takes a special type of self-loathing, of the level seen in Europe, to demand that everyone accept the importation of those who are ideologically anthithetical, or to GTFO if they do not. Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton is just that special type:
“Dayton bluntly stated his opinions on the racial tension in St. Cloud and across the state in regards to immigration.
“‘Look around you. This is Minnesota,’ Dayton said. ‘Minnesota is not like it was 30, 50 years ago. … This is Minnesota and you have every right to be here. And anybody who cannot accept your right to be here, and this is Minnesota, should find another state.’
“…
“‘If you are that intolerant, if you are that much of a racist or a bigot, then find another state. Find a state where the minority population is 1 percent or whatever. It’s not that in Minnesota. It’s not going to be again. It’s not going to be that in St. Cloud, or Rochester or Worthington,’ Dayton said.”
Barack Obama isn’t the only Democrat to be praised in a cult-like manner. Now Hillary! Clinton is getting in on the action, being the replacement goddess of a once Christian hymnal:
Of course, this goddess, like most goddesses, requires human sacrifice, which may be performed down at the local Planned Parenthood…

It has long been the stereotypes that conservatives were sex-hating prudes who wanted the state to rule everyone’s sex lives, while the Left cherished “privacy” and wanted to get the government “out of the bedroom.” This is the opposite of the truth.
The “right to privacy” over contraception involved forcing the government to deliver it. The “right to privacy” over abortion now includes forcing third parties to subsidize it. The “right to privacy” over sodomy is all about forcing bakers, florists, photographers, and pastors to validate it. It was never about the “right to privacy,” but the power to use government to support and subsidize these things, and by so doing, normalize anything and everything that wasn’t reproductive coitus for the purpose of having babies. In other words, the sexual views of the Left are those of the Marquis de Sade.
The Left have no compunction about violating the “right to privacy” when it suites their end. In California, there is already a drive to grab the private medical history of not just current porn stars, but former porn stars as well. Investigating the private sexual lives of one subpopulation is wrong if it is a politically correct subpopulation, but not for a politically incorrect subpopulation.
The ultimate goal, then, is neither a “right to privacy” nor engaging in any sex one wants free of “bourgeois” values and norms of coitus being about reproduction and the union of husband and wife, but the destruction of those very norms and values. If “privacy” or sexuality can be used to destroy those norms and values, then “privacy” is used as the casus belli for that destruction.

However, if that “privacy” shields people from the increasingly totalitarian nature of the Left’s sexual politics, then it is to be swept aside, with the government invading the bedroom in order to regulate every aspect of a person’s private sex life.
The “yes means yes” movement is trying to change the definition of rape from one of non-consent, either by inability to consent or explicit consent, to the assumption that all sex is rape unless each and every action, or change thereof, is assumed to be rape, and where consent is automatically considered lost if not explicitly reaffirmed in every exacting detail at least once every ten minutes!
News of the Week for October 18th, 2015