A Kentucky county clerk has been thrown in jail, and may be so thrown again, for refusing to issue Marriage Licenses to same-sex couples, consistent with the Kentucky Constitution but at odds with Anthony Kennedy’s “feelz.”
The issuance of licenses is either dobuleplusgood or doubleplusungood based on, as Kennedy demonstrated, “feelz”, as the veritable Stacy McCain notes:
“This is what our nation’s liberal elite demands in 2015, because the liberal elite believes in a radical egalitarian ideology in which only those who are deemed ‘oppressed’ have any influence or protection in American society. The law must judge every conflict according to a simple question: ‘Who is the greater “victim of society” here?’ The victims always win, and therefore the only way to ‘win’ is to present yourself as a helpless loser, in order to demand that ‘society’ give you whatever you want as compensation for your oppressed condition.”
No where better can this be shown than from elected officials refusing to issue licenses for guns and the concealed carry thereof.
“A state official who objects to protecting enumerated constitutional liberties is hardly in the same position as a person objecting to facilitating a ‘right’ five justices created out of whole cloth (historically speaking) five minutes ago. If one can’t see the difference in those propositions, then we should just give up on public discourse entirely because reason and logic no longer matter.”
Radical feminist lesbian, but I repeat myself, Julie Bindel has opened up to the “radfem collective” about her thoughts on destroying heterosexuality and abolishing the “Patriaricial” idea of gender.
Of course, to RadFem nutjobs, sexuality isn’t just about sexuality, it’s totally about politics:
“Political lesbians are really crucial, because we were the ones that first said that women should be able to determine their own sexuality. We were the ones that said that all women can be lesbians and that heterosexuality is compulsory under a system of male supremacy. We were the ones that said that until women had a free choice, that we had to speak about heterosexuality as imposed upon us, rather freely chosen.”
She goes on to denounce male homosexuals as erotisizing “inequality, subordination, pain and dominance”. It doesn’t matter if you are Pat Robertson, Dan Savage, or “Caitlyn” Jenner… you are still an evil penis person. Anything short of a lesbian collective is evil:
“So radical feminism saw heterosexuality under patriarchy as massively problematic, because it benefited men and it disadvantaged women. It meant that the family structure was one that had the man at the Head of the household – even if he wasn’t a dinosaur, even if he thought of himself as quite progressive.”
The family structure benefits both men and women. Each brings the unique aspect of each sex together to benefit, and be benefited by, each other while creating an environment where a child has the benefit of both a mother and a father. But to the RadFems, men are icky and biological reality is just a social construct.
The browser grand Soviet, AKA Mozilla, has already demonstrated their “luv” for “tolerance” for firing Brandon Eich, who dared to commit the sin of agreeing in 2008 with Barack Obama’s position on Gay Marriage at the time.
Considering that not even agreeing with the “politically correct” positions of the Social Justice Warriors who have metathesized as a cancer in Silicon Valley, is it any surprise that these truebigots have vowed to fire an anonymous employee who expressed a dislike of those same Social Justice Warriors on Reddit? The anonymous Redditor simply said in total:
“Frankly everyone was glad to see the back of Christie Koehler. She was batshit insane and permanently offended at everything.
“When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole feminists are gone, the tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief.”
It is clear that Hillary! Clinton is nowhere near the scam artist and confidence trickster as her accused-rapist husband. She largely escaped the Benghazi scandal, but the sheer degree of illegality combined with utter hubris she has shown over her private servers and freely tossing about classified documents seems to have grown real legs.
The scandal, though, has also revealed the seedy under-jowl-belly of Hillary! and Bill’s political machinations, such as conspiring to impeach Clarence Thomas (which is par for the course when it comes to their view’s on Blacks), though the belittlement of John Boehner probably ain’t all inaccurate…
Her hubris can be most easily seen by her staffers happily accepting illegal foreign campaign contributions.
As the veritable Ace of Spades noted, her entire approach to the law and to America’s security is… YOLO.
After a humiliating drubbing in this years Parliamentary election, the U.K.’s Labour party is having a leadership contest. The leading candidate believes that Osama bin Laden deserved a trial, presumably with a Rotherham jury, and that Osama being whacked is a “tragedy“.
You know he’s hard core insane Leftist when even Neil Kinnock is telling you Corbyn is too out there!
Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.
The focus this time: Thought criminals will be re-educated.
First, a little mood music:
Carrying on…
The Left are hell bent on ret-conning history:
“The teaching of American history is ground zero in the left’s battle to indoctrinate students. The new AP U.S. History framework is the left’s ultimate weapon in this battle.”
A few brave souls have shown a willingness to stand up against this re-education:
“We wish to express our opposition to these modifications. The College Board’s 2014 Advanced Placement Examination shortchanges students by imposing on them an arid, fragmentary, and misleading account of American history. We favor instead a robust, vivid, and content-rich account of our unfolding national drama, warts and all, a history that is alert to all the ways we have disagreed and fallen short of our ideals, while emphasizing the ways that we remain one nation with common ideals and a shared story. . . .
“Rather than issuing detailed guidelines, the College Board has in the past furnished a brief topical outline for teachers, leaving them free to choose what to emphasize. In addition, the previous AP U.S. History course featured a strong insistence on content, i.e., on the students’ acquisition of extensive factual knowledge of American history.
“But with the new 2014 framework, the College Board has put forward a lengthy 134-page document which repudiates that earlier approach, centralizes control, deemphasizes content, and promotes a particular interpretation of American history.
“This interpretation downplays American citizenship and American world leadership in favor of a more global and transnational perspective. The College Board has long enjoyed an effective monopoly on advanced placement testing. The changes made in the new framework expose the danger in such a monopoly. The result smacks of an “official” account of the American past. Local, state, and federal policymakers may need to explore competitive alternatives to the College Board’s current domination of advanced-placement testing.
“The new framework is organized around such abstractions as ‘identity,’ ‘peopling,’ ‘work, exchange, and technology,’ and ‘human geography’ while downplaying essential subjects, such as the sources, meaning, and development of America’s ideals and political institutions, notably the Constitution. Elections, wars, diplomacy, inventions, discoveries—all these formerly central subjects tend to dissolve into the vagaries of identity-group conflict. . . .
“Gone is the idea that history should provide a fund of compelling stories about exemplary people and events. No longer will students hear about America as a dynamic and exemplary nation, flawed in many respects, but whose citizens have striven through the years toward the more perfect realization of its professed ideals.
“The new version of the test will effectively marginalize important ways of teaching about the American past, and force American high schools to teach U.S. history from a perspective that self-consciously seeks to de-center American history and subordinate it to a global and heavily social-scientific perspective.”
Of course, it’s not as if dissenting voices will necessarily be allowed in the future…
Remember how “bisexual” meant that you are into both dudes and chicks? Apparently you can not be attracted to someone of the same sex and still be considered “bisexual“!
But more than this is the moral aspect of “sexual orientation”. In this brave new world “straight” and “heterosexuality” are considered morally impure and aspects of oppression. Being White automatically makes one an oppressor. Girls can take moral superiority back by screeching “misogyny” left and right, but only really transcend their moral impurity by being Lesbian or “trans”, while boys only have the choice of being “queer” or “trans” to achieve the same. It is the difference between being called a bully and being an “anti-bullying” advocate.
The authorities in Rotherham, England turned a blind eye to sex slave gangs because the monsters selling underage girls as whores were of a Politically Correct faith and Politically Correct race/ethnicity.
“The detective, who is still in the hospital recovering from injuries to his head and neck, now reveals that he hesitated to use force against Cunningham because of the post-Ferguson war on cops. ‘A lot of officers are being too cautious because of what’s going on in the media,’ the officer told CNN. ‘I hesitated because I didn’t want to be in the media like I am right now.'”
Thankfully this hasn’t gone so far, yet, to turning a blind eye to young girls being sold for sex, though since cities like San Fransisco have already embraced worse as morally acceptable.
When people fear being beaten or killed less than being smeared as a H8r in the media, than society has entered a very dark place. The only difference between the police officer’s reaction and that of the Rotherham “see no evil” crowd is one of degree only.
Apparently being straight has nothing to do with being heterosexual or not. Straightness has been redefined to be a system of White/Middle Class oppression of everyone else.
