News of the Week for June 7th, 2026
News of the Week for June 7th, 2026

With in-person early voting over for Nevada’s primary, only mail and non-polling place drop-offs are left before Election day. Overall, Republicans lead in-person voting by nearly 15,000 voters while the Democrats have a mail lead so far of nearly 19,000 voters. With the additional mail ballots coming in this coming in this week expected to be similarly favorable to the Democrats, their overall voter lead is expected to grow. The Democrats has an overall lead in the primaries of 2022 and 2024, as well.
Nevada est omnis divisa in partes tres
The state can be divided, as Caeser might say, into three parts: Clark County, which contains Las Vegas and 70% of the states population; Washoe County, which contains Reno and 20% of the states population; and the rural counties, which contain 10% of the states population.
Clark County leans Democratic and continues to do so. The rural counties are overwhelmingly Republican if not more conservative (hard right 3rd parties can be elected to partisan office in many rural counties).
This leaves Washoe as the “Bellwether” county which has usually in the past always gone with the statewide winner in every statewide contest in Nevada this century. However, Washoe, which has a slight Republican plurality or near parity, has been shifting, despite the registration numbers, more reliably to the Democrats.
This is also only the second mid-term primary since Covid19 and the 2020 elections, which saw major changes to the election system, such as hitherto rare absentee ballots becoming universally sent out (save for those who specifically opt out), which changed the dynamics of the early voting numbers.
Where things stand after the end of in-person early voting
Statewide, the GOP has an in-person early ballot lead of just over 16% over the Democrats, while the Democrats have a nearly 10% lead in mail ballots returned and accepted. The good news for the Democrats is that about twice as many ballots have been returned and accepted overall than there have been early voters. This results in an overall voter lead of nearly 5000 out of nearly 295K total votes, or about 1½ %. In 2022, the Democrats had ca 2% lead and in 2024 a lead of ca 4%.
Overall, there isn’t some massive shift in relative turnout like we’ve seen in so many other states, with similar overall number of votes cast, which reflects the near parity of the parties’ voter registration totals.
Of note, the 2nd week early voting resulted in fewer Republican gains, with Democrats winning more in-person votes cast in populous Clark County.
In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.
This decade has seen riots and chaos, from the George Floyd riots to J6. Sixty years ago, other protests turned riots resulted in violent confrontations and calls for an independent “people’s” board to review police actions in New York City, which were ultimately rejected by the voters. But this was a hotly debated topic as the debate between William F. Buckley, Jr. and Theodore Woodrow Kheel demonstrated when they discussed the question of a Civilian Review Board: Yes or No?
Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.
The focus this time: Everybody just wants to die it seams.
First, a little mood music:
Carrying on…

Is life in Canada so bad that death is a better alternative?
“The euthanasia conference was held at a Sheraton. Some 300 Canadian professionals, most of them clinicians, had arrived for the annual event. There were lunch buffets and complimentary tote bags; attendees could look forward to a Friday-night social outing, with a DJ, at an event space above Par-Tee Putt in downtown Vancouver. ‘The most important thing,’ one doctor told me, ‘is the networking.’
“Which is to say that it might have been any other convention in Canada. Over the past decade, practitioners of euthanasia have become as familiar as orthodontists or plastic surgeons are with the mundane rituals of lanyards and drink tickets and It’s been so long s outside the ballroom of a four-star hotel. The difference is that, 10 years ago, what many of the attendees here do for work would have been considered homicide.”
![]()

The Conservative Intellectual Movement has, contrary to the beliefs of some, achieved stunning victories and reversals. There is no clearer example of this than the remaking of not only the Supreme Court, but lower courts as well, in large part due to the decades of work by the Federalist Society. This happened, not because they played the Left’s game of legislating by the bench and ruling in favor of what they believed was in the public good, but by reimposing constraint and adhering to the law. They did not impose a conservative vision, a more conservative and less Leftist outcome was the result to eschewing Leftist tactics.
However, that strain on the (purported) right that believes in the “common/public good” as the embodiment of a socialist desire to mould society instead wish to copy the mistakes of the Left and use any “ambiguity” to impose their vision of “how things oughta be”.
“At the margins, under objective legal standards that are fairly applied, the law should be interpreted to advance conservative ideas–i.e., the public good. Of course we should preserve the rule of law, which liberals constantly traduce. But there are many opportunities to turn the law in a more conservative direction, as liberals have done for many years. We can do it more effectively, with more integrity and consistency.”
The problem here is that conservatism, in the Anglo-American vein, is not about proscriptive ideas that ought to be imposed to change society, but the rich inheritance and heritage that serves as guidelines and constraint on such fanciful fundamental transformations of America. Impartial application of precedent and the law is not a barrier to the “public good”, but rather the very foundation for it!
The notion that judges should “interpret” precedent to fit preconceived personal policy positions (the so-called “common/public good”) is to admit that they think of precedent as a speed bump to their policy objectives—it’s “Living Constitutionalism”. Moreover, it’s not “based” but “cringe”.
The ability to regrow limbs like many non-mammalian species, from worms to lizards, has been a holy grail of regenerative medicine. Now, scientists at Texas A&M have created a specially-engineered serum which shifts “the cells away from scarring, and then … provide[s] the signals that tell them what to build.” From the abstract:
“Epimorphic regeneration in mice is stimulated at a non-regenerative digit amputation by sequential treatment with FGF2 and BMP2 (FGF2→BMP2). FGF2 stimulates digit amputation wound cells to form a blastema and BMP2 induces blastema differentiation to regenerate the amputated distal phalangeal element, albeit imperfectly. The formation of a phalangeal growth plate suggests that the induced regenerate recapitulates embryonic development and cell lineage studies show that wound cells that enter the blastema cells are positionally re-specified during regeneration. FGF2→BMP2 treatment also stimulates a blastema-independent response that regenerates a synovial joint complex containing stump-derived tendon, ligament and a sesamoid-like bone. Together the blastema-dependent and blastema-independent responses can result in the regeneration of all skeletal structures removed by amputation. The induced regeneration response demonstrates the availability of regeneration competent cells at a non-regenerating wound, and that FGF and BMP signaling is sufficient to trigger a regenerative outcome at wounds that heal by fibrosis.”
Of course, this is bigger than just allowing humans patients to regrow lost limbs. Add in some genetic coding and this could be used to grow neko mimi (i.e. cat ears) and associated neko tail!

“Big Brother” has crept into our lives so subtly, that most people haven’t noticed, and those who have increasingly approve of it “for the children”. Oh, it’s not a person sitting inside your bedroom or even a video screen of a person watching you… it’s digital and the insidiousness of it is that you don’t even notice.
![]()
The camels nose was the claim that this was all intended to “protect kids”. But the implementation requires not only “age approval” to prevent kids from accessing þe olde “pr0nz”, but to record and track everyone, not just for smut, but increasingly for any electronic communications… including just using a telephone.
And don’t think you can get around this with a VPN, even a reputable one. Your digital papers that are your phone or other device will spy on you anyway. And it’s already going beyond simple age verification to outright monitoring you for the purpose of others deciding if you are allowed to use anything digital, including your own car.
You can’t avoid it. Even now accounts are being consolidated amongst a handful of companies, which can cancel you account—thus preventing you from doing anything—for using software that isn’t authorized, not using registered electronics, or just blocking your for using a device that isn’t “familiar”. With everything increasingly required to be done digitally, and particularly from you phone/digital-papers, refusal to comply becomes increasingly impossible.
And it will be used against you. Already in Europe these “for the children” measures are being used to hunt down people who express doubleplusungood thoughcrimes. And yes, it can and will be used against you here in America.
Already, this user verification required just to have permission to use programs and devices is happening in America, from authorization to use an “app store”, which increasingly a duopoly of walled gardens, to requiring A.I. flag “suspected mass violence”. Aside from the overreach resulting from flagging even harmless things, the requirement to collect, parse, and report any utterance the government deems snoop worthy is a threat to privacy and to freedom from government tyranny.
News of the Week for May 31st, 2026

The primary elections in other states have show wide and, for many, unexpected party turnout shifts. In Democratic dominated states like California and Oregon, early results show the Republicans, though behind in overall numbers, turning out at a higher rate than Democrats. In contrast, in more Republican heavy states like Georgia and Texas, the Democrats have actually outvoted the Republicans. So, where does Nevada lay on this spectrum after its first full week of early voting?
Nevada est omnis divisa in partes tres
The state can be divided, as Caeser might say, into three parts: Clark County, which contains Las Vegas and 70% of the states population; Washoe County, which contains Reno and 20% of the states population; and the rural counties, which contain 10% of the states population.
Clark County leans Democratic and continues to do so. The rural counties are overwhelmingly Republican if not more conservative (hard right 3rd parties can be elected to partisan office in many rural counties).
This leaves Washoe as the “Bellwether” county which has usually in the past always gone with the statewide winner in every statewide contest in Nevada this century. However, Washoe, which has a slight Republican plurality or near parity, has been shifting, despite the registration numbers, more reliably to the Democrats.
This is also only the second mid-term primary since Covid19 and the 2020 elections, which saw major changes to the election system, such as hitherto rare absentee ballots becoming universally sent out (save for those who specifically opt out), which changed the dynamics of the early voting numbers.
2026 Numbers So-Far
Statewide, the GOP has an in-person early ballot lead of 20% over the Democrats, while the Democrats have just under 7% lead in mail ballots returned and accepted. The good news for the Democrats is that over twice as many ballots have been returned and accepted overall than there have been early voters. This results in an overall voter lead of only 1500 out of nearly 127K total votes, or about 1%. In 2022, the GOP had an over 4000 overall voter lead out of about 111K, or ca 4%. Of note, the non-partisan and third party voters (Independent American Party and Libertarian Party), have a higher percentage of in-person voters, with ca 13% compared to 9% from 2022.
Overall, there isn’t some massive shift in relative turnout like we’ve seen in so many other states, and the 1st Week of in-person early voting has been pretty similar for the past three primary elections, with the major variable as of 2026 being the highly independent/3rd-party vote.
In Person Early Vote after 1st Week
| Year | GOP | Dem | Other % |
| 2022 | 53.5% | 33.3% | 13.2% |
| 2024 | 56.3% | 35.6% | 8.1% |
| 2026 | 57% | 34% | 9% |
Mail Vote Received and Accepted*
| Year | GOP | Dem | Other % |
| 2022 | 36.7% | 43.1% | 20.2% |
| 2026 | 36.7% | 43.2% | 21.6% |
In Clark County, the Democrats have a voter edge of over 9%, which contrasts with the just under ca 4%. In contrast, in Washoe, they have a slight voter lead of less than 700 votes compared to a less than 400 voter lead for Democrats in 2022, which is a shift of a few percent, and not indicative of Washoe being just as competitive as it ever was.
In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.
With the current military engagement with Iran, let us look back sixty years ago when a very different was became divisive in a way we haven’t seen since. William F. Buckley, Jr. and repeated Socialist nominee for President, Norman Thomas, discuss the war in Vietnam and whether we should pull out, stay in, or escalate.