Even the most psychotic yandere can visions of sugarplums sempai dancing in their head…
![]()
Even the most psychotic yandere can visions of sugarplums sempai dancing in their head…
![]()
Today is the 227th anniversary of the first ten amendments to the Constitution coming into effect. The original Bill of Rights contained a preamble stating that the clauses were “declaratory and restrictive” — i.e. they restricted the Federal Government and simply declared already existing rights and liberties. This is in stark contrast with almost every non-American declaration of rights, wherein inherent rights are conflated with promised of government handouts and benefits.

The Bill of Rights, as passed by Congress, has twelve articles, the 3rd through 12th became what we know today as the first tend amendments to the Constitution and what people generally refer to when they speak of the Bill of Rights. The first article that was proposed was never ratified; the second article was ratified over 200 years later and became the 27th Amendment.
Below is the Bill of Rights, including preamble, as passed by Congress:
.
CongressOF THE United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.:
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Article the first
After the first enumeration required by the first Article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons.
Article the second
No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.
Article the third
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Article the fourth
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Article the fifth
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Article the sixth
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Article the seventh
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Article the eighth
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Article the ninth
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Article the tenth
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Article the eleventh
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Article the twelfth
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
ATTEST: Frederick Augustus
Muhlenberg, Speaker of the House of Representatives
ALL of the Bill of Rights for ALL of the People
Could there be nothing that shouts “Christmas” more than a bucket of KFC?
Not to the Japanese!

It’s all thanks to a bunch of foreigners in the ’70’s who couldn’t find any turkey for Christmas.
![]()
Actual snowflakes, as opposed to the all-too-easily-triggered type, are but crystalline water, the structure of which can be determined by X-ray crystallography. The water molecules form hexagonal structures, as seen in the rotating 3D ball and stick crystal structure seen below:

An increasingly common trope amongst the Leftist Intelligencia is that White people have no “culture”, at least beyond being evil incarnate, and that everything they have was stolen or, again, an evil that must be destroyed. This mass unpersoning of an entire race by equating “Whiteness” with the whole of modern Western Civilization puts them in a position of institutional disempowerment and institutional disadvantage in order to justify both racial hatred and to legitimize the Western Civilization itself.
Sadly, more often than one might hope, the defense of Western Civilization and the White populations from whence it largely came is defended by veiled, and not-so-veiled White supremacists, and often invoked racist tropes and questionable statistics.
Western Civilization, and the racially White cultures from whence it came, stands on its own:
However, Western Civilization, which while comes from White populated civilizations by and large, nonetheless has the capability to go beyond such limitations of blood and soil.
How kill-happy do you have to be when the already kill-happy Belgian medical establishment is so shocked that you are brought up on criminal charges for participating in the killing of your patients?
This kill-happy:
“Three doctors from East Flanders are being investigated on suspicion of having ‘poisoned’ Tine Nys in 2010. The 38-year-old had been diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, a mild form of autism, two months before she was euthanized by a doctor in an apparently legal killing that she had asked for.
“Belgium is one of two countries, along with the Netherlands, where the euthanasia of people for psychiatric reasons is allowed if they can prove they have “unbearable and untreatable” suffering. Among Belgians euthanized for mental health reasons, the most common conditions are depression, personality disorder and Asperger’s.”

While many find it fun to point out the absurdity of the entire “transgender” thing, this “pwning” of the “libs” is predicated on the assumption that it remains purely fringe and that simply by pointing out that it looks absurd is all that is needed for the great masses to rise up in unison against it.
This ignores that “transgender medicine” is yet another case of þe olde Gramscian march through the institutions that has been going on for the better part of a century. From this the fundamental precepts of society have been eaten away, and much as with same-sex “marriage”, people have become primed to accept it once opposition to it is denormalized.
In order to counter all this, it is important to understand how it came to be in the first place. A pediatric endocrinologist goes over some of the history of how all this got started, and how it got so big:
News of the Week for Dec. 9th, 2018
With the election of Steve Sleestak Sisolak to the Governorship of Nevada (the first Democrat to win the seat in nearly a quarter of a century) combined with Democrats newly gained supermajority in the state Assembly (they missed out winning a supermajority in the state Senate by only 24 total votes), the Democrats in Nevada are poised to turn this once purple state a deep shade of blue. This is the first time the Democrats have won a trifecta in Nevada since before the end of the Cold War.

And what is high up on Sisolak’s agenda? Eviscerating the 2nd Amendment (as well as Article I, Section 11 of the Nevada Constitution):
“Gov.-elect Steve Sisolak says tougher gun laws are one of his top priorities as he takes the top office in Nevada.
“Sisolak told The Associated Press that he wants to see the state ban assault weapons, silencers and bump stocks, which the gunman used in the Las Vegas shooting to modify his guns to mimic the firing of a fully automatic weapon.”
Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.
The focus this time: F**k off you icky Whites!
First, a little mood music:
Carrying on…

Meanwhile, in the U.K.…
“Male, pale and stale university professors are to be given ‘reverse mentors’ to teach them about unconscious bias, under a new Government funded scheme.
“Under the project, white men in senior academic posts will be assigned a junior female colleague from an ethnic minority as a mentor.
“Prof John Rowe, who is overseeing the project at Birmingham University, said he hoped the scheme will allow eminent professors to confront their own biases and leave them ‘feeling quite uncomfortable’. “
![]()