The “Model State Constitution” has been around, with revisions, for 100 years now.  As someone who used to read current and former state constitutions for fun and relaxation, I’ve found the “model” constitution to be lacking and not especially good as restraining abuse of power as other current or state constitutions, or provisions thereof.

     A few years ago I toyed around with the idea of working collaboratively with others to put together a conservative model state constitution.

     I’m thinking of trying to do so again.

     If you think that this’d be interesting, let me know.

Posted on by The Political Hat | 1 Comment

Pronoun Madness in British Columbia Courts

     In a criminal or civil court, lying tends to be severely punishable; in criminal or civil court going against a judge’s will and committing contempt of court also tends to be severely punishable. In British Columbia courts, people will be expected to proffer their “pronouns” with the expectation that these “pronouns” as well as preferred titles be used to avoid having to make “corrections”.

“In an effort to be more inclusive of transgender people, the Provincial Court of B.C. has created a new policy asking lawyers to provide pronouns when introducing themselves and their clients in court.

“While some lawyers have already started including pronouns in their introductions, the court will now expect everyone to share how they wish to be referred to.

“In a press release, the provincial court provided an example of such an introduction: ‘My name is Ms. Jane Lee, spelled L-E-E. I use she/her pronouns. I am the lawyer for Mx. Joe Carter who uses they/them pronouns.’ (Mx. is a gender-neutral title.)

“The policy was announced by Chief Judge Melissa Gillespie in a notice to lawyers and the public on Wednesday.

“The court said the policy change will improve the experiences of gender diverse people in the legal system and would help avoid confusion and the need for corrections when someone is misgendered.”

     How do you even pronounce “Mx.”?

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Education Organizing Community Gathering

     An initiative or program entitled “Education Organizing Community Gathering” sure does sound innocuous enough, but you know that even something that sounds innocuous isn’t when it turns out to be a “Critical Analysis Tool” proffered by the “Vermont Coalition for Ethnic & Social Equity in Schools”.

     This “Critical Analysis Tool” outright says that “Critical Thinking” isn’t “thinking carefully”, but rather defines it as “uncovering power hierarchies for the purpose of changing oppressive systems” and presumes that pre-determined “oppressive systems” are there and that it is just a matter of finding them and confirming one’s bias. It further defines “Critical Analysis” not as an actual analysis of anything but that is involves making “a plan, idea, or action more just and equitable”.

     This presentation was created by one Hannah Miller, a “science educator”, with nothing more than a bachelor of arts in biology (not even a bachelor of science!).

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (January 17th, 2021)

 

News of the Week for Jan. 17th, 2021


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (January 17th, 2021)

The Woke Indoctrination Of 8 Year Olds

     The indoctrination by government of Critical Race Theory is not limited to bullying adults: A Cupertino elementary school is bullying eight year old kids into peak wokeness and forcing the youthful “oppressors” to check their privilege with intersectional critical theory! Christopher Rufo yet again has obtained documents from this indoctrination.

     With the exception of the “Kyriarchs” who have nothing but “oppressor” traits, everyone else can claim “victimhood” status, but also be an “oppressor”.

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – Woke Medicine: Vaccines As Social Justice; Racism As A Disease; Discrimination As Healthcare

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Societal Bloodletting

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Such is the devotion to “equity” that some people are willing to see “incorrect” populations die to achieve it.

“As if we needed another reason to lose faith in the expert class, here is a medical ethicist in the New York Times discussing the CDC’s rollout of the coronavirus vaccine:

‘Harald Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities. “Older populations are whiter,” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”’

“This is what happens when ‘science’ and the racial identitarianism of the modern intellectual Left collide. ‘Historically,’ says the Times, the committees tasked with deciding this sort of thing relied on ‘scientific evidence to inform its decisions.’ Nowadays, members are ‘weighing social justice concerns as well.’ It would be merely obscene if ethics professors were theorizing about saving — or, rather, not saving — lives based on race. How long before half-baked social science is being used by technocrats in positions of power and influence to ration medical care? You know who else is a ‘medical ethicist’ at the University of Pennsylvania? Ezekiel Emanuel, a Biden adviser on medical issues, who believes human beings are bits of GDP that have no real purpose once they hit a creaky 75 (with an exception made, no doubt, for the 78-year-old president-elect). Emanuel and Schmidt, in fact, co-authored a textbook titled, ‘Rationing and Resource Allocation in Healthcare.’”

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Disrupt Texts: When Schoolbooks Go Full Woke

     Some people still think that “wokeness”, “decolonization”, and teaching “social justice” is a fringe idea that at worst happens in some Left-wing dominated city.   It is hard to argue that point when the officialSchool & Library Marketing department of Penguin Young Readersopenly partners withDisrupt Texts”, “A movement to rebuild the literary canon using an antibias, antiracist critical literacy lens”, to provide eight “teaching and learning guides” that can “be integrated into classrooms tomorrow”.

     Texts include such paragons of wokeness as “Antiracist Baby”, amongst other drivel.

     This guide is based on four “Core Principles”:

Four Core Principles to #DisruptTexts

#DisruptTexts’s mission is to aid and develop teachers committed to anti-racist/anti-bias teaching pedagogy and practices. There are four core principles to #DisruptTexts:

  1. Continuously interrogate our own biases and how they inform our thinking.

As teachers, we have been socialized in certain values, attitudes, and beliefs that inform the way we read, interpret, and teach texts, and the way we interact with our students. Ask: How are my own biases affecting the way I’m teaching this text and engaging with my students?

  1. Center Black, Indigenous, and voices of color in literature.

Literature study in U.S. classrooms has largely focused on the experiences of White (and male) dominated society, as perpetuated through a traditional, Euro-centric canon. Ask: What voices—authors or characters—are marginalized or missing in our study? How are these perspectives authentic to the lived experiences of communities of color?

  1. Apply a critical literacy lens to our teaching practices.

While text-dependent analysis and close reading are important skills for students to develop, teachers should also support students in asking questions about the way that such texts are constructed. Ask: How does this text support or challenge issues of representation, fairness, or justice? How does this text perpetuate or subvert dominant power dynamics and ideologies? And how can we ask students to wrestle with these tensions?

  1. Work in community with other antiracist educators, especially Black, Indigenous, and other educators of color.

To disrupt and transform curriculum and instruction requires working with other educators who can challenge and work with us as antiracist educators. Ask: How can we collaborate to identify, revise, or create instructional resources (like this guide) that can center and do justice to the experiences of historically marginalized communities?

Each principle stands for actions that are culturally sustaining and antiracist. Through each principle, teachers aim to offer a curriculum that is restorative, inclusive, and therefore works toward healing identities and communities.

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Witches and Warlocks and Pumpkin Possums!

     If Alex Jones thinks you are a crazy conspiracy nutter… you might want to reexamine your life.

Continue reading

Posted in Elections, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Communist China Openly Celebrates Genocidal Eugenics

     The People’s Republic of China is the most murderous regime to have ever existed, exceeding even Nazi Germany in its body count. Some apologists have argued that those deaths were necessary and that Communist China was better because they weren’t committing genocide like the Nazis did via eugenic sterilization, race-based slave labor, and outright murder. Those apologists ignore the eugenic sterilization, race-based slave labor, and outright murder being committed by Communist China RIGHT NOW with the knowledge and collaboration of the West.

     So secure is the Communist leadership of China in their belief that they can do whatever they want with absolute impunity, they have the gall to declare this as a wonderful thing, including declaring the forced sterilization of Uygher women and the abortion and even outright infanticide of Uygher children by saying that “the minds of Uygur women in Xinjiang were emancipated and gender equality and reproductive health were promoted, making them no longer baby-making machines” and that “[t]hey are more confident and independent”!

     The Chinese Communists admit that “Family planning policies have been fully implemented in the region in accordance with the law” and even cite the reason for their genocidal policy:

“The Uygur population grew from 10.2 million in 2010 to 12.7 million in 2018, an increase of more than 25 percent, while the population of Han people in the region increased by just 2 percent to 9 million over the same period.”

     Perhaps the only reason people are horrified by The Holocaust but not so many other genocide wasn’t because of the genocide per se, but because both sides of the Cold War found it a useful cudgel against a common enemy, an not an inconvenient fact to be justified like it was in the Soviet Union or it’s useful tools in the West.

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (January 10th, 2021)

 

News of the Week for Jan. 10th, 2021


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (January 10th, 2021)