News of the Week for Mar. 28th, 2021
News of the Week for Mar. 28th, 2021

Pictured: The Moon being oppressed.
The twig-worshiping “nature rights” movement to grant inalienable rights and even personhood to ecosystems and “Gaia” now want to do the same to the rest of the cosmos, specifically to “Selene”: Earth’s Moon! The “Declaration of the Rights of the Moon” is as follows.
We the people of Earth –
Acknowledging the unique, intact, interconnected lunar environments and landscapes which exist on the Moon;
Acknowledging the ancient, primordial relationship between Earth and the Moon;
Mindful of how much is still unknown about the co-origins of Earth and the Moon;
Aware that the Moon is critically important to the healthy functioning of the Earth System, and is a vital sustaining component of all life on Earth;
Aware that the Moon holds deep cultural and spiritual meaning for human beings;
Acknowledging that the cycles of the Moon have enabled life itself to evolve on Earth;
Mindful of the immeasurable value the Moon holds as a repository of deep time and connection among all beings who have ever lived on Earth, since its features have remained almost unchanged since time immemorial;
Conscious that wealthy nations and corporations are developing technologies that may make it possible to return to, live on, mine and otherwise alter the Moon;
Aware of humanity’s impact on the Earth – causing ecosystem collapse, a new era of mass species extinction and global climate change – and seeking to avoid destruction and change to the natural systems and ecosystems of the Moon,
Declare that –
The Moon – which consists of but is not limited to: its surface and subsurface landscapes including mountains and craters, rocks and boulders, regolith, dust, mantle, core, minerals, gases, water, ice, boundary exosphere, surrounding lunar orbits, cislunar space – is a sovereign natural entity in its own right and, in accordance with established international space law, no nation, entity, or individual of Earth may assert ownership or territorial sovereignty of the Moon.
The Moon possesses fundamental rights, which arise from its existence in the universe, including:
(a) the right to exist, persist and continue its vital cycles unaltered, unharmed and unpolluted by human beings;
(b) the right to maintain ecological integrity;
(c) the right to be defined as a self-sustaining, intelligent, cohesive, intact lunar ecosystem, beyond current human comprehension;
(d) the right to independently maintain its own life-sustaining relationship with the Earth’s environments and living creatures; and
(e) the right to remain a forever peaceful celestial entity, unmarred by human conflict or warfare.
The Moon is not a “sovereign natural entity”, nor does it have a living ecosystem. It is literally a big rock in space that circles Earth.
Georges Méliès film “A Trip to the Moon” is not a documentary.
Note the this “sovereign” entity not only has rights, but those “rights” extend from its orbit all the way down to the atmosphere of Earth! It’s like astronauts/cosmonauts are “literally” raping the moon with phallic rockets just be going into space!
It turns out that some people believe that racism isn’t just systemic, but a disease known as “Whiteness” that must be “cured”. Treating “racism” as a public health crisis is something that many states have explicitly endorsed. But there is nothing wrong with that, some might declare, because racism is bad! But when racism is the same thing as “Whiteness”, the final solution to “racism” becomes clear, as a writer at “The Root” has surmised that “Whiteness Is a Pandemic” and concludes that:
“White supremacy is a virus that, like other viruses, will not die until there are no bodies left for it to infect. Which means the only way to stop it is to locate it, isolate it, extract it, and kill it. I guess a vaccine could work, too. But we’ve had 400 years to develop one, so I won’t hold my breath.”
When “Whiteness” manifests through the mere existence of White people, the only and final solution is to eliminate the disease vector.

Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.
The focus this time: Word crimes!
First, a little mood music:
Carrying on…

Nothing says “1984” like purging words from the lexicon!
“As part of its ongoing efforts to feature language that is more inclusive and reflective of modern-day society, Dictionary.com will no longer include the word ‘slave’ as a noun identifying a person, instead using the adjective “enslaved” or referencing the institution of slavery. The change is one of 7,600 updates the online resource has announced, which also include the addition of terms relevant to race, social justice and identity, such as ‘BIPOC’ (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) and ‘Critical Race Theory.’
“The latest updates — which also include capitalizing ‘Indigenous’ when referring to people, and adding entries for ‘racialization,’ ‘disenfranchisement’ and ‘overpolice’ — follow those announced last September. That round of revisions saw the capitalization of the word Black in reference to people, and the addition of terms relevant to mental health (specifically, suicide and addiction) and LGBTQ identity. John Kelly, managing editor of Dictionary.com, tells Yahoo Life that the changes are an important part of respecting the power of language and its ability to offer representation and dignity.”
![]()

One of the cult methods used by the “woke” Left to convert people who are of the “oppressor” class is to tear them down, make them feel “uncomfortable”, and then offer a “healing path” through ideology put into action as deeds. It is known as “the Pedagogy of Discomfort” and it is literally a cult initiation method. Twitter user “Wokal Distance” addresses this.
1/
"Sit with it"This is the meme level version of the "pedagogy of discomfort."
The goal is to use discomfort/shame to destroy your moral authority and create emotional vulnerability they can exploit in order to manipulate you.
It's a disgusting and manipulative tactic. https://t.co/s3eKvsRYS6 pic.twitter.com/nqWwI4xIeL
— Wokal Distance (@wokal_distance) March 20, 2021
2/
The point is to accuse people of bigotry (IE racism and sexism) and then force them to "sit with the uncomfortable emotions and body sensations that arise when encountering potentially difficult topics."The academic literature in Social Justice says this explicitly: pic.twitter.com/wkBYtdZZX3
— Wokal Distance (@wokal_distance) March 20, 2021
3/
To fill you with as much shame/discomfort as possible, they try to prevent "turning away in fear and/or getting hijacked by intellectualizing"In other words, you're not allowed to leave (turn away) or use your brain to think about what they tell you (intellectualizing) pic.twitter.com/JDjp9Ja1To
— Wokal Distance (@wokal_distance) March 20, 2021

Many states in the United States including New Hampshire, West Virginia, and Iowa have moved to ban the teaching the furtherance of Critical Race Theory. However, due to the 1st Amendment, it is impossible to fully outlaw it. France, in contrast, does not have free speech and bans “hate speech” and some French politicians want to label Critical Race Theory, not inaccurately, as “hate speech”.
French conservative politicians propose using France's anti-racist hate speech laws against critical race theorists. 👀 https://t.co/OuedTw9KQU
— PEG (@pegobry) March 18, 2021
This is in response to the National Union of Students of France (UNEF) banning White individuals and otherwise engaging in hateful bigotry. Translated from French:
“At the microphone of Europe 1 Wednesday, the president of the National Union of Students of France (UNEF) admitted the existence of meetings prohibited to whites. One more episode in the series of controversies that have affected the union for several years.”

In the quest to achieve “equity” and “social justice” to policing, the Left has embraced the concept of “disparate impact” where any variance in crime statistics involving race vis-à-vis racial demographic statistics is presumed to be caused by racism. The proposed George Floyd Justice in Policing Act would make this, and worse, mandatory nationwide.
“First, that a disparate impact by race or sex in traffic stops is considered prima facie evidence of racial profiling. Second, that because disparate impact alone is enough to get a police department in trouble, the police will have an incentive either to stop Asian and female motorists who are not speeding, or not to stop black and male motorists who are speeding, all in an effort to “get their numbers right.”
“Readers won’t be surprised to learn that this isn’t the only ill-considered provision in the bill. Two additional troublesome provisions are connected: taxpayer-funded giveaways to ethnic-advocacy organizations and the imposition of racial preferences in hiring police officers.
“Sections 111–114 are taxpayer-funded giveaways to wealthy progressive organizations such as the NAACP, the ACLU, UnidosUS (formerly La Raza), the National Urban League, the National Congress of American Indians, and the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium. These “community-based organizations” will receive grants from the attorney general to study various law-enforcement topics, including racial profiling, residency requirements, compensation and benefits, youth justice, hiring and recruitment, etc.
“These studies are supposed to result in pilot programs that will fulfill accreditation standards (because the legislation will also require police departments to be accredited by certain law-enforcement organizations). The pilot programs will train police departments to meet accreditation standards in the areas of: “investigation of officer misconduct and practices and procedures for referring to prosecuting authorities allegations of officer use of excessive force or racial profiling; disproportionate contact by law enforcement with minority communities . . . community relations and bias awareness,” among other things. The pilot programs will also develop ‘policies, procedures, and practices for the hiring and recruitment of diverse law enforcement officers who are representative of the communities they serve;’ and ‘the development of selection, promotion, educational, background, and psychological standards that comport with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.’
“…
One of the adages that sadly tends to be far more accurate than not when it comes to state legislatures is the “no man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session”.

The Nevada Legislature is no different these days, especially when it comes to gun rights. Democrats have introduced an anti-gun bill, AB286, that would prohibit home-made guns, but more frighteningly could turn law abiding concealed carry weapon permit holders as well as anyone who open carries a handgun into felons and deny them a fundamental Constitutional right. Specifically:
“Section 2 of this bill establishes similar provisions which make it unlawful for a person to possess a firearm on a covered premises without the written consent of the owner or operator of the covered premises or an agent thereof after being warned by the owner, operator or agent that possessing the firearm on the covered premises is prohibited.”
But business owners ought to have the right to prohibit guns in their own businesses, some may say. The thing is… businesses already have the right to prohibit guns and kick out someone carrying a gun. What this bill does is impose sever criminal penalties against people who are trying to obey the law due to the badly written language of the bill.
The criminal penalties kick in once a person has been “warned by the owner, operator or agent that the person is prohibited from possessing the firearm on the covered premises”. The problem is that posting a sign “in a conspicuous place at the covered premises” or receiving a document at a public accommodation facility is the only warning, without defining what a “conspicuous place” is or require the sign itself to be conspicuous!
To make matters worse, this “covered premises” includes the entire property, including a parking lot, and even potentially common areas of residential properties. Furthermore, there is no requirement that the “conspicuous place” be viewable before on enters into or onto the “covered premises”. A person who has to enter into or onto the premises to even potentially see the warning will, according to a broad yet possible reading of this bill, become a criminal automatically without warning, potentially becoming a felon even if they did not see any warning because it wasn’t viewable from the part of the property a person enter into or onto, or if they immediately leave from said property after seeing the warning. This would have the effect of dissuading people from legally carrying even in non-prohibited businesses for fear of unwittingly stepping on a the property of a “covered premises” that did not post a warning viewable from without said property.
The California Board of Education has voted to implement the so-called “Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum (ESMC)”, which is based on the Marxism-derived “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.” How bad is it? It will have students appeal to Aztec gods that countless people in the past were sacrificed to and even achieve the final solution of a “countergenocide” against White people.

The veritable Christopher Rufo yet again presents source documents:
SCOOP: California's proposed "ethnic studies" curriculum calls for the "decolonization" of American society and has students chant to the Aztec god of human sacrifice. The solution, according to one author, is a "countergenocide" against white Christians.
Here's the story.🧵
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) March 10, 2021
California's Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, based on the Marxist "pedagogy of the oppressed," instructs students to "challenge racist, bigoted, discriminatory, imperialist/colonial beliefs" and critique "white supremacy, racism and other forms of power and oppression." pic.twitter.com/AUvaI9YiiO
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) March 10, 2021
R. Tolteka Cuauhtin, the original co-chair, worked on the early American history material. In the references, he denounces the United States as a "Eurocentric, white supremacist, capitalist, patriarchal, heteropatriarchal, and anthropocentric paradigm brought from Europe.” pic.twitter.com/E7HYup9GKy
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) March 10, 2021
According to Cuauhtin, whites began "grabbing the land," "hatching hierarchies," and "developing for [whiteness]," which created "excess wealth" that "became the basis for the capitalist economy." Whites continue to subject minorities to "domestication" and “zombification." pic.twitter.com/tgYFWQEnHA
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) March 10, 2021
In a related "mandala," Cuauhtin claims that white Christians committed "theocide" against indigenous tribes, killing their gods and replacing them with Christianity. White settlers thus established a regime of “coloniality, dehumanization, and genocide.” pic.twitter.com/dAWxhpjIpr
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) March 10, 2021
News of the Week for Mar. 21st, 2021