Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.
The focus this time: Groomers who groom.
First, a little mood music:
Carrying on…
You’d think that if a school board wanted a child to know some book, that they’d be happy to see that child repeat the knowledge of what he was taught by that book to his school board… yet said school board yelled that it wasn’t publicly acceptable for said school child to repeat in public what he’s been told!
“Middle-school librarians now think homosexual pornography is appropriate reading material for 11-year-old students.
“Eleven-year-old sixth grader Knox Zijac got up at a school board meeting to read a page from the book Nick and Charlie, which is about a homosexual couple having sex. This explicit book was a featured novel on a display stand in his middle school library, according to Knox. The student, so young he still had trouble pronouncing the ‘r’ in ‘library’ and ‘librarian,’ said that his middle school librarian not only helped him check the pornographic book out (Knox wanted to show his father the book) but offered to help him find similar books, including a graphic novel version. ‘Graphic’ is certainly the accurate description of this supposedly sixth-grade-level reading material.”
An 11–year-old sixth grader reads a sexually explicit book "Nick and Charlie" in front of the school board in Maine. The book was on display at his middle school library.
These are the books being offered to kids in public schools. pic.twitter.com/rLzxlFoNmZ
— 3sidedstory 🇺🇲 (@3sidedstory) February 25, 2023
Telling your middle school students to divulge their entire sexual history and experience used to be something that not even the Weekly World News would have thought plausible… yet here we are…
“A Boston public school elicited outrage among parents this week when it presented pre-teen students with an explicit survey asking them about their sexual history, including whether they’ve performed oral sex.
“The principal of Eliot K-8 Innovation School in a Thursday letter to parents acknowledged the ‘many concerns’ over the survey, which was administered on Wednesday to some sixth- and seventh-graders.
“A copy of the survey shows it inquired about the pre-teens’ risk behavior, with several questions asking about their sexual history. ‘Have you ever participated in oral sex?’ one question asked. ‘Oral sex is when a person puts their mouth on another person’s genitals or private area,’ the survey explained.”
It just gets worse from there…
It is telling when school boards condemn censorship of materials taught in schools that they feel to be censored from parents of children in said schools…
“[S]ome of these books give explicit instructions on how to sign up for apps like Grindr, along with explicit instructions on how to perform sex acts–usually homosexual, but not always. That the descriptions are of homosexual sex is hardly the point; straight, gay, bi, queer…this is the promotion of illegal activities and enabling of sexual predators of all sexual persuasions.”
GRAPHIC: A parent in @PCSDSchools read from pornographic books available to students. The books include encouraging the use of sex apps & graphic sexual content.
Leaving the board uncomfortable & speechless, a board member then attempts multiple times to get her to stop reading pic.twitter.com/pxVL1hHnED
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 9, 2023
A mom in @ClarkCountySch reads from a graphic assignment her daughter was required to do. Her mic then gets cut off because it’s inappropriate for a public discussion.
Adults can’t handle hearing this content yet they readily give it to kids in school. How does it make sense? pic.twitter.com/GFP1bGhNlg
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 17, 2022
TTFN.
Pingback: In The Mailbox: 03.23.23 : The Other McCain