The Eschaton Is Always But One Immanentization Away

     There is a utopian mirror-universe version of Hobbes that channels Rousseau. The default is utopia and we’d have it if only evil forces were gone.   When this utopia isn’t achieved, blame must be placed just as the Soviets did with “wreckers” and Kulaks (or Nazis with Jews). James Lindsay notes as much, which is quoted in full below due to the limitations of Twitter/X embeds.

Why totalitarianism always produces mass murders:

The belief in any totalitarian system is that there is some “enemy” that holds back society. Once that enemy is destroyed and purged, society will flourish, or so the cult belief goes.

That doesn’t happen, though, because the “enemy” isn’t actually the cause of the problem, and purging the “enemy” doesn’t build society.

The power, by then vested in the totalitarian state, still operating on the belief that the “enemy” is the problem, always insists that the lack of prosperity is due to the “enemy” remaining, but in hiding.

That hidden “enemy” must then be found and purged. This also fixes nothing and usually starts making things much worse, and the cycle repeats until collapse.

It only works this way every time.

     This also leads to the justification where the purge or punishment justifies itself. If you are the “good” and they are the “evil”, then it is their “evil” that causes you to defend yourself and your goodness. It doesn’t matter if you can point to any actual reason or brook any defense they may pose. That you crushed them is the only proof you need that you are justified.   The punishment is its own justification.

Posted in Progressives | Tagged | Comments Off on The Eschaton Is Always But One Immanentization Away

Glock Block Crock

     Way back in 2008, 2nd Amendment advocates and conservatives won a resounding victory with District of Columbia v. Heller which explicitly stated that the 2nd Amendment protects the individual’s right to keep and bear arms, including arms in common use such as handguns. One of the brands of handguns in widespread common use is Glock.

     California has decided to ban them anyway with the signing of AB 1127 by Gov. Newsom.

“The bill’s language is highly specific — and clearly aimed at one of the most popular handgun platforms in America. Glocks, known for their striker-fired simplicity and reliability, use a cruciform sear mechanism that meets the exact technical definition outlined in the bill. With the added stipulation that the pistol must be ‘readily convertible,’ lawmakers are essentially banning the sale of Glock models like the G19, G17, and others that have been repeatedly associated — legally or not — with illegal full-auto conversion devices.

“Supporters of the bill say it’s a necessary step to prevent the illegal use of Glock switches, which convert standard handguns into fully automatic weapons. These switches are already banned under federal and California law, but AB 1127 goes further — cutting off sales of entire handgun models based solely on the potential that they could be modified.”

     This comes amid other anti-RKBA laws:

“AB 1127 is just one of three new gun-related laws Newsom signed this week. AB 1078 imposes new requirements on concealed carry license applicants, including listing each firearm by make, model, and serial number. SB 704 mandates that all firearm barrel sales go through licensed dealers and background checks — targeting what lawmakers describe as a growing market for ‘ghost gun’ parts.”

Continue reading

Posted in Gun Rights, Progressives | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (October 19th, 2025)

 

News of the Week for October 19th, 2025


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (October 19th, 2025)

Firing Line Friday: A Firing Line Debate: Resolved: That the Flat Tax Is Better than the Income Tax

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     Once upon a time, there was serious debate about replacing the existing income tax scheme with a flat tax so that the tax code was about economic prosperity and fairness, rather than a means of economic and social central planning. Let us look back thirty years ago when this was formally debated by Willian F. Buckley, Jr., Jerry Brown, John C. Goodman, George S. McGovern, Lester C. Thurow, Robert Kuttner, Steven, Mann, and Pierre S. Du Pont, with Michael E. Kinsley moderating.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: A Firing Line Debate: Resolved: That the Flat Tax Is Better than the Income Tax

Quick Takes – College Word Crimes: Same DEI Office Different Name; Same DEI Office Different Title; Same DEI Essay Different Applicants

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: “Why don’t you judge a book just by it covers unless it covers just another” — Johnny Rotten.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Just because they’ve gotten rid of a name for an office doesn’t mean you got rid of the office or change what it does.

“West Chester University in Pennsylvania has changed the title of its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) office, but a university official has admitted that it will keep the same goal of promoting DEI.

“The new Office of Equal Opportunity and Compliance was so named a few days before President Donald Trump’s inauguration, as reported by The Quad, the university’s student paper.

“Dr. Tracey Robinson, Vice President of the school’s Division of Access, Compliance and Engagement, announced the change in a memo, and claimed the new office name was a form of ‘preemptive compliance,’ The Quad wrote.

“‘The goal was to safeguard our work and it was to ensure that there is some opportunity to describe and categorize the work that we do . . .Was it an offensive move? Yes, it was, it was to have some choice before it was no longer a choice,’ she continued.

“She added that the new office will keep providing the same DEI programs and initiatives despite the name change.”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Quick Takes – College Word Crimes: Same DEI Office Different Name; Same DEI Office Different Title; Same DEI Essay Different Applicants

Motte & Bailey à la Vance

     One of the most common fallacies in modern politics, particularly growing with the Right, is þe olde Motte & Bailey fallacy. Take, for example, the oft quipped “fight like the Left”. The Motte here is that it means standing up to the Left and proactively pushing back. In this form, it just means not being part of a “surrender caucus” that clutches at pearls before giving in to go to some purported “cocktail party”. The Bailey, as has become increasingly obvious, it to adopt the tactics of the Left. But even then that is only a peak into the Bailey as when it comes to socialism, it’s never just the tip. Increasingly we’ve seen endorsements of Communist analysis and even Communist frameworks, such as those from Antonio Gramsci, forming a type of Right-wing critical theory complete with praxis, while concomitantly we’ve seen acceptance of National Socialist thinkers like Carl Schmitt. Thus, we see a warped type of Molotov-Ribbentrop pact with American characteristics.

     Replete with such underpinnings comes a cessation of worrying about an unbridled government and a learning to love Leviathan, complete with corporatism, where the power of the state is used to guide society towards a purported Common Good. And that same Motte & Bailey trick was used to get us here, as, once again, J.D. Vance has demonstrated.  First, the Motte:

     We can see that this is presented as the more innocuous call to use political power rather than let it fall by the wayside after elections. That is what brings people in and allows the Bailey argument to worm its way in sub rosa. And what is that Bailey?

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Smashing the Duo-Normative Diarchy In Canada: Three Men And A Kid

     After vanquishing the “irrational animus” against same-sex marriage and achieving total victory even within the GOP, we now clearly see the next target against the “system of oppression” that dares define marriage as between a man and a woman is now being fought, specifically the duo-normative diarchy!

     We have already see mixed male-female “thruples” of three people, all female “thruples”, and even many all male “thruples”. But it’s not quite “equality” with those duo-normative “oppressors” unless they can all be mommies/daddies… and that’s something Canada is addressing.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on Smashing the Duo-Normative Diarchy In Canada: Three Men And A Kid

The Aberration And Lies Of Nostalgia

     Nostalgia is one hell of a drug.   For some people, the present is an exercise, not in what is good, but what detracts therefrom. The future is forever descending doom. No wonder, then, why so many want to look back as older movies and ads and hope for a world where that fantasy could be real… to the point of believing that it is not only real, but we can will it into existence. Again, nostalgia is one hell of a drug.

     The truth is that the halcyon past wasn’t perfect. Even is somethings feel worse now, the past wasn’t the utopia that some people seem to fancy it as, and in many ways it sucked compared to what we have now.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

News of the Week (October 12th, 2025)

 

News of the Week for October 12th, 2025


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (October 12th, 2025)

Firing Line Friday: Is the Anti-Terror Bill a Danger to Civil Liberties? Part II

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The question of whether certain measures are necessary for safety to protect out liberties or an attack on the same, sparked by recent violence, is nothing new as this discussion on whether a then proposed anti-terror bill is a danger to civil liberties by William F. Buckley, Jr., Steven Emerson, Ira Glasser, Michael E. Kinsley, Victoria Toensing, James J. Zogby, and Davic Cole demonstrate in the second part of this discussion.

Continue reading

Posted in War & Terror | Tagged , | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: Is the Anti-Terror Bill a Danger to Civil Liberties? Part II