News of the Week for Jan. 29th, 2023
News of the Week for Jan. 29th, 2023
My apologies! Recent real life stuff and responsibilities have unfortunately curtailed posting as of late. I’ll try to adjust and try to post a bit more regularly.
As an apology, here is a live kitten cam.

Colleges and universities have become the fountainhead of wokeness that is increasingly poisoning society. Not just in the classrooms, but it is also the administrations of these colleges and universities which have turned their entire institutions towards the singular goal of wokeness. The Manhattan Institute, via Christopher Rufo, Ilya Shapiro, and Matt Beienburg, have introduced model legislation to stop public colleges and universities from existing to spread wokeness through “Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity” offices and training.
There is a lot that state legislatures can do to reverse the illiberal takeover of higher education through Diversity, Equity, Inclusion (DEI) offices that, ironically, stifle intellectual diversity, prevent equal opportunity, and exclude anyone who dissents from a rigid orthodoxy. Here are four proposals for reforming public universities:
Abolish DEI bureaucracies.
End mandatory diversity training.
Curtail political coercion.
End identity-based preferences.
News of the Week for Jan. 22nd, 2023
In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.
Journalists acting as if they are a special protected class or simply better than others is nothing new, as is the actual protection from “shield” laws the allow journalists to refuse to testify in court to protect sources. William F. Buckley, Jr. discusses just how much protection for the press there ought to be with Charles Rembar and C. Dickerman Williams.
Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.
The focus this time: Live in the pod while paying reparations Gaia, complete with lawyer’s expenses.
First, a little mood music:
Carrying on…
Mother Nature thinks they’ve missed the point…[/caption]Your purported better know where you ought to live, and they are looking at empty low-density states to build their utopian cities.
“The beginnings of a new, sustainable city in the American desert could emerge within just eight years, according to billionaire Marc Lore, founder of Diapers.com and Jet.com, and others working on the Telosa project.
“…
“‘Despite capitalism and all its strengths, and the great material progress we’ve made, it’s not perfect,’ he said. ‘So we thought about: Is there another way?’
“Scandinavian countries such as Denmark fund their extensive social services through taxes, Lore said. The full tax rate for an individual in Denmark is 52%, though the effective tax rate is lower in most cases due to deductions.”
Of course this will be post-capitalism.
And of course it will be one of those “walkable” cities dense urban hellhole lovers wax poetic about.
“Telosa will have 36 districts, each of which is envisioned as a ‘15-minute city’: It will take residents of each district no more than a 15-minute walk or a shorter bike ride to reach their daily needs, including offices and living spaces.”
![]()
Gun-grabbing politicians are at it again, this time in New Mexico, by trying to outlaw and seize all “assault weapons” and magazines that holds more than ten rounds… and there is no grandfathering in of existing guns. You either sell them or surrender them. HB 101 (2023) says:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
SECTION 1. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read:
“[NEW MATERIAL] RESTRICTIONS ON LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINES.–
A. A person shall not possess, manufacture, purchase, sell or transfer any large-capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. This section shall not apply to magazines originally designed to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition that have been modified to accept no more than ten rounds and that are not capable of being readily restored to a capacity of more than ten rounds.
B. For the purposes of this section, “large-capacity ammunition feeding device” means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than ten rounds of ammunition. “Large-capacity ammunition feeding device” shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
C. Any person who may not lawfully possess a large-capacity magazine commencing July 1, 2023 shall, prior to July 1, 2023:
(1) remove the large-capacity magazine from the state;
(2) sell the large-capacity magazine to a licensed firearms dealer; or
(3) surrender the large-capacity magazine to a law enforcement agency for destruction.
D. Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a fourth degree felony.”
SECTION 2. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read:
“[NEW MATERIAL] RESTRICTIONS ON ASSAULT WEAPONS.–
A. As used in this section:
(1) “assault weapon” means any:
(a) semi-automatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following: 1) a pistol grip or thumbhole stock; 2) any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; 3) a folding or telescoping stock; or 4) a shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel;
(b) semi-automatic pistol or any semi-automatic, centerfire or rimfire rifle with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition;
(c) semi-automatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following: 1) any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; 2) a folding, telescoping or thumbhole stock; 3) a shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel; or 4) the capacity to accept a detachable magazine at any location outside of the pistol grip;
(d) semi-automatic shotgun that has one or more of the following: 1) a pistol grip or thumbhole stock; 2) any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; 3) a folding or telescoping stock; 4) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of five rounds; or 5) an ability to accept a detachable magazine;
(e) shotgun with a revolving cylinder; or
(f) conversion kit, part or combination of parts from which an assault weapon can be assembled if those parts are in the possession or under the control of the same person; and
(2) “assault weapon” does not include any firearm that has been made permanently inoperable.
B. A person shall not manufacture, import, possess, purchase, sell or transfer any assault weapon.
C. Subsection B of this section shall not apply to:
(1) any government officer, agent or employee, a member of the armed forces of the United States or a peace officer to the extent that such person is otherwise authorized to acquire or possess an assault weapon and does so while acting within the scope of that person’s duties;
(2) the manufacture of an assault weapon by a firearms manufacturer for the purpose of sale to any branch of the armed forces of the United States or to a law enforcement agency in the state for use by that agency or its employees; provided that the manufacturer is properly licensed under federal, state and local laws; or
(3) the sale or transfer of an assault weapon by a dealer that is properly licensed under federal, state and local laws to any branch of the armed forces of the United States or to a law enforcement agency in the state for use by that agency or its employees for law enforcement purposes.
D. Any person who may not lawfully possess an assault weapon commencing July 1, 2023 shall, prior to July 1, 2023:
(1) remove the assault weapon from the state;
(2) render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or
(3) surrender the assault weapon to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction.
E. Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a fourth degree felony.”


Texas has seen bills introduced to stop Critical Gender Theory and Critical Race Theory. Now, a bill has been introduced to stop the state colleges and universities engaging in the praxis of “Diversity”, “Inclusion”, and “Equity” (AKA “DEI”, or more accurately the “DIE” agenda). HB 1006 (2023) states, in part:
(f) Each institution of higher education shall adopt a policy detailing students’ rights and responsibilities regarding expressive activities at the institution. The policy must:
(1) demonstrate a commitment to intellectual freedom and viewpoint diversity;
(2) prohibit:
(A) the funding, promotion, sponsorship, or support of:
(i) any office of diversity, equity, and inclusion; and
(ii) any office that funds, promotes, sponsors, or supports an initiative or formulation of diversity, equity, and inclusion beyond what is necessary to uphold the equalprotection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and
(B) the endorsement or dissuasion of, or interference with, any lifestyle, race, sex, religion, or culture.
You can’t censor those who call for “DEI”, but you can make sure that they can’t censor or punish you for dissent.
News of the Week for Jan. 15th, 2023
In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.
After the poor showing for some Republicans in this past election, while other Republicans did great, we come back to the question of the role of conservatism and more particularly the question of conservatism itself and the challenges it faces. This same question of what are the challenges for conservatives fifty years ago was discussed by William F. Buckley, Jr., Gabe Pressman, Richard Reeves, and Mary Perot Nichols.
Until next Friday.
![]()