Higher education has been the incubator for Social Justice Warriors, be it under Critical Theory, “Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity”, or “Social Emotional Learning”, since these ideologies of insanity were first envisioned. An in depth study by the James G. Martin center explores this metathesis in depth, and ought to serve as both a warning and an objective analysis of this enemy to mankind.
From the Executive Summary:
Critical Social Justice (CSJ) poses a threat to higher education and to the American way of life. This school of thought goes by many names, including Critical Race Theory, Critical Theory, Multiculturalism, and Identity Politics. All these ideologies divide the world into aggrieved minorities and oppressive majorities, reducing people to a group identity grounded in immutable characteristics such as race and sex. They are based on a distorted view of what a human being is, compromising the pursuit of truth and diverting institutions that adopt it away from excellence and merit and toward factionalism. They cultivate resentment and anger among the supposedly aggrieved while undermining the stability, equal treatment, and mutual toleration that contributes to individual happiness and good citizenship. Universities promote CSJ policies under the seemingly innocuous rubric of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).
Most schools in the UNC System have adopted CSJ in their strategic plans, and things are accelerating across the system. A system-wide Racial Equity Task Force, which the Board of Governors seemingly empowered, released a report in December 2020 to accelerate the push to extend DEI programming into all facets of all the universities. It called for more administrative DEI hiring throughout the system and establishing more new programming aimed supposedly at aggrieved minorities, including curricular changes and more developed retention programs. The entire report was based on the idea that the UNC System represents systematically racist notions of achievement that could be deconstructed through careful administrative oversight.
Nearly every university is committed to building a DEI infrastructure. Here are the highlights from a survey of publicly available information across the system:
- Total DEI administrative salaries across the system exceed $12 million.
- Both UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State each have 11 DEI administrators making more than $100,000, with more than 30 DEI employees total at each school. Salaries at each university total more than $3.25 million.
- UNC System medical schools have extensive DEI administrative functions, including the UNC School of Medicine’s nine administrators dedicated to DEI and the Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina’s five DEI administrators (three of whom earn more than $100,000).
- All 16 schools have DEI aspirations laid out in their strategic plans.
- At least seven schools require implicit bias training for all job search committees.
- Curricula dedicated to DEI are expanding not only through increased general education requirements but also through “Living-Learning Communities” that promote social activism.
- The Racial Equity Task Force is pressuring schools to conform to these mandates.
The CSJ-DEI complex is expanding rapidly in the UNC System. Soon many more colleges will have deans and associate deans dedicated to promoting this pernicious ideology. Those deans will enact more policies such as requiring new candidates to submit DEI statements, creating higher pay scales for supposedly aggrieved minorities, or making optional training mandatory. Any influx of monies will be diverted in large part to further these DEI efforts. The Board of Governors and the legislature stand at an inflection point: either stop the DEI industrial complex or it will take over North Carolina’s universities.
The full report can be found here or read below: